Question Home

Position:Home>Books & Authors> Harry Potter fans: You get to kill one character, who?


Question: Harry Potter fans: You get to kill one character, who!?
Include your reasons for which character you think deserves to die and in what way!. You can't pick a character who is already dead such as Nearly Headless Nick or Sirius, although you can if you so wish chose a character who got a crap death like Tonks and Lupin!.

(I will choose the best argument, regardless of which character it is so don't worry about me having favouritism!.)Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
Ron Weasley: Should have died, it was totally unrealistic that all 3 of the golden trio survived without anything really bas happening to them!. It would have been much better if he had died saving Hermione instead of Rowling writing that Mary Sue ending!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Well, to be honest, I was seriously disappointed that Harry himself didn't die!. Rowling set everything up perfectly for him to die (so it didn't surprise me too much that she DIDN'T kill him off; surprise ending and all), but to me, the story would have ended a lot better if he'd ended with the series!. It would have lent a lot of poignancy and depth to the legacy of his character; Harry would have been the perfect tragic hero!. I was very unhappy that after following a series that matured so fully as it progressed, I was spoon-fed some romance novel, happily-ever-after, slapdash ending!. It didn't ruin everything, but it definitely let me on an irritated endnote!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

Harry Potter!. Definitely!. He is 'amazing' even though he isn't actually that good at magicness and he hasn't worked to get where he is!. He only thinks about himself and his character is extremely boring and repetitive!. He's very predictable and relies on everyone else around him to save him, and they rely on him too much!. He's a very boring character, and (apart from the inevitable mourning), the Harry Potter books (well the last few) would have been much better without him!. I think he should be killed by someone like Lucius Malfoy in a duel!. This would prove how he actually wasn't that good!Www@QuestionHome@Com

Ginny deserved to die more than Fred!.

She was told to stay where she was and threw a spoiled little princess tantrum, then she was asked to step out and come right back and she ran out into the battle - delighted!.

Harry Potter didn't lead an army because it was cool and so that everybody would think of him as a grown up!. Ginny Weasley ran into a battle where people were dying everywhere and was practically skipping with glee!.

She should have been killed if she thought it was a fun place to impress the grown ups with her flying snot spell!.

I did like that she didn't acomplish anything in the battle though, and especially that her Mummy had to save her from Bellatrix Lestrange!.

Ginny wasn't good enough or mature enough and just because she's a girl it's no excuse for putting other people at risk just to prove you can handle yourself!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

i'd kill Lucius Malfoy (no offense), not only because he was a jerk, but also because it would have helped the Malfoys see the light earlier!.

Lucius didn't help Harry nor Voldemort so killing him would further emphasize two things:
1) Voldemort's ruthlessness as Lucius used to be a higher level death eater!.
2) If Lucious was killed, then Narcissa and Draco would have seem more regretful and more at the mercy of Voldemort!. The Malfoys' conversion would have been more in character!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Hepzibah Smith, the lady who had Slytherin's locket and Hufflepuff's cup!. She will need to die before Voldemort procured a job from Borgin and Burke's!. If Voldemort needed a artifact from one of the founders, he would have to use those two relics!. Unless there are more that we don't know about, Voldemort would have had a significant problem creating Horcruxes!. He could have settled for a less historic item, but I can't remember if there were any more relics from Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

When I read the announcements of the deaths of Tonks and Lupin in 'HP and the Deathly Hallows', I did wonder if it was written that way in homage to JRR Tolkien, and the various summarily described 'died in battle' characters at the end of 'The Hobbit'!.

Luna Lovegood expiring in Neville Longbottom's arms having failed to betray him even though subjected to the cruciatus curse would be interesting to write!.

I'm not saying she 'deserves' to die, just that there are great dramatic possibilities there!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Rowling should have killed umbridge!. I don’t know why that hag was missing in the final scene!. Anyway, my answer to your question is snape!. I know he got killed but I don’t like the way he died!. I would have liked him to go down in a fight!. I would have liked harry to find out the truth before snape’s death!. Then there could have been a fight between snape and voldy…it would have been interesting to let harry watch snape fight voldy to save him!. It would have been more dramatic and less ironic than getting killed by an unemotional Nagini!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

Harry!. No questions asked!. I think he engages in pointless heroics!. I know he's the hero of the books and all, but there is no need to go looking for trouble like he did!.

Ever hear the phrase "Curiosity killed the cat"!? Well, Harry was the cat, and his curiosity should have killed him!. But it didn't!. Why!? Because I think Rowling was writing an ending that would save her from being disowned by her fans!. Or something!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

weeeeeeeeeell!.
i like the bad guys sooo:]
haha!. *looks at answer above me* i love lucius:]

i would almost say harry!. i dont know why!. but if jk rowling screwed the whole thing with the epilogue where she really can't write anymore to the series she should have just went and killed harry off if she wants to make a point that shes done with the series!. i love harry but i think he should have died with the series!. :]Www@QuestionHome@Com

Hmmmm!.!.!.!.!.I really believe Mundungus Fletcher should have died!. This sounds cruel, but he kind of deserved it!.He stole from Sirius's house!. It is his fault Harry almost had his wand taken away from him in the 5th book, because he wasn't there when he was supposed to be and the Dementors came and yada!.!.yada!.!.yada!.
He is a coward, which is basically the reason Mad-Eye died!.
I just don't think he should have gotten away with all that!.

Www@QuestionHome@Com

Slughorn - I found him extreamly irritating! The way he parades around the classroom sniffing everything and stuffing himself with crystalised fruits! Just poison him, like Ron was in Book 6!.

If I couldn't get Slughorn, then Percy Weasley!. I hated his pompous, stuck-up attitude! He should have died instead of Fred!.

I actually like Lucius and the other Dark wizards!.!.!.they're more interesting!.

G!.W!.KWww@QuestionHome@Com

Pansy Parkinson!.!.!.I hated her so much!. She was underhanded, loud and just as evil as the rest!. She followed Draco around like a puppy, patting his hair trying to win his affection!. She would sell anyone out to get ahead!.!.!.!.!.she deserved the cruciatus curse right to the face followed by a nice big Avada Kedavra!Www@QuestionHome@Com

Possible strange choice - Severus Snape!.

At the end he got a crap death!. I always thought there was a link between him and the Potter family and I would have liked him to have gone down fighting!.!.!.It would look especially good with Alan Rickman acting the role!.

PaulWww@QuestionHome@Com

Lucius!.!.No way!.!.he's too much drama and good looking!. I'd say Neville Longbottom!.!.he's better off with his parents in heaven!.!.ahaa *--) I'd like one of the defence against the dark arts teachers to accidently kill him!.!.that will be exciting but I wouldnt want it to be a slow death cuz I'd probably get teary all of a sudden haha!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Umbridge!. I can't stand her!. I seriously cringe everytime I read about her in the books (or see her in the movie)!.!.!. Anyways, she needs a taste of her own medicine, since she's just one step above murderer in my book!. It would definitely be a long, painful death :DWww@QuestionHome@Com

i think cho chang's friend marietta-if it weren't for her then Dumbledores Army would've continued and Dumbledore would've stayed headmaster-and Neville and Luna wouldn't be lonely :(Www@QuestionHome@Com

Umbridge or Cornelius FudgeWww@QuestionHome@Com

Lucius MalfoyWww@QuestionHome@Com

Harry Potter coz he is a tardWww@QuestionHome@Com

um probz hav to be ron
i h8 him
even though he is a big characterWww@QuestionHome@Com

YouWww@QuestionHome@Com

I'd say lucius malfoy cuz he's a jerk!Www@QuestionHome@Com

i actually did kill harry in real life! it was pretty sweetWww@QuestionHome@Com