Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> Is the Big-Bang proof of God?


Question: Is the Big-Bang proof of God!?
1!.The Big-Bang is the origin of Space, Time, Energy & Mass!.

2!. Therefore the The Big-Bang transcends Space, Time, Energy & Mass!.

3!. That which is the cause of and transcends Space, Time, Energy & Mass is God!.

4!. Therefore God exists!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
I'd say yes!. This is the Deist view of things!. This is objective proof!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

That is some faulty logic!. Atoms colliding do not transcend time, space, energy, or mass!. also, the big bang is not the origin of all that, only the origin of some things within some known bounds!. In fact big bang conditions are the focus of much research (think CERN)!. You cannot prove or disprove the existence of god using standard logic!. You can make an argument, for or against, up until the point of absurdity!. However, philosophical scholars have been doing this for some time and these arguments are not particularly compelling Www@QuestionHome@Com

The big bang was considered a possibility, but not proof!. Proof is the creation of the world!. The big bang was a chemical reaction that started the creation of the world, think of it as day 1 in Genesis, however the sun wasn't created till day 3, so if the sun were a result of the big bang then why would it be created on day 3 rather than 1 to the power -43 seconds between the big bang and the creation of the first star!. Who caused the big bang, of course the answer is an Intelligent designer, so the big bang is a result of Gods existence!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

It depends on your personal definition of God and how strict of a requirement you put on it!.

But this is a good and valid point that, although different cultures have had different conceptualizations of what God is, the one thing that is commonly agreed upon is that it is some force outside of those things!.

Although, one could argue that light also transcends all those things as well!. Perhaps there is also validity when people refer to god as "limitless light"!.

Www@QuestionHome@Com

The big bang doesn't transcend Space, Time, Energy & Mass!.
It's their beginning, it's part of them!.

It was self caused, for something else to cause it they would need time!.
Creating time is by definition impossible, because in order to create something it must first not exist and obviously there was never a time when time didn't exist!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

You're talking of the "First Cause" Argument, There is no proof either way as to how the big bang really began!. My personal beleif is one that's shared with some, where the big bang is repetitive!. There is proof to suggest the expansion of the universe is decellerating, suggesting something slowing it down or pulling it back, so eventually it may stop and maybe begin to shrink!.!. in which case could it be possible that it could shrink back to an infitesimally small volume only for the big bang to happen all over again!.!.

Though there are many theories, you just have to go with what you personally believeWww@QuestionHome@Com

There are many things that transcend space time energy and mass:
-the tears of a child
-the sparkel in the eyes of a loved one
!.!.!.
That's why I am a religieus ath?ist: I see the beauty of those things without placing a god behind it!.!.!.
Placing a god behind this (like you do with the big bang) kinds of kills the magic!.!.!.
also if vanity is a sin god could not create a universe in witch he could be known or proven!.!.!. Ackham's razor: Something only exists if it is necessary!.!.!. and that is a personel choice!.!.!. for me it's not necessary! Plus you talk about the christian god!.!.!.
If I would say: Is the big bang proof of Zeus!? You would laugh!.
Imagine how I am feeling!.!.!. X-( )Www@QuestionHome@Com

What then made God !?

Define God!. Define Time, as it is relative!.

My point is that nobody knows, all we can do is theorise!. It's fun to theorise of course, as it is fun to attempt to prove or disprove the existence of God, but in the end, all we can do is accept that some believe and some don't!.

Faith is as impossible to prove, even if we all have faith in ourselves!. Faith cannot be proven by semantics or otherwise, only by acceptance!.Faith in yourself however, does not prove that God exists, it only proves that you have faith in yourself!.

Personally, I prefer to keep questioning rather than placing assumption higher than rationality!. After all, who is to say that the Big Bang did not happen at the finite point of time of the collapsing of another universe !? !.!. You cannot prove otherwise!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Partially to respond to other responders -- the Big Bang is a theory only in some loose sense!. All evidence (and there's a lot of it) seems to be entirely consistent with the occurance of a "Big Bang" event!. The people who fixate on the word "theory" here are probably the same people that think evolution is "just a theory"!. They are usually not academics active in the field, nor are they particularly conversant on what the "theories" actually explain or how they conform to the evidence!. So despite what a lot of the responders here might claim, the overwhelming likelihood, given all the evidence and even a minimal sense of rationality, is that there was indeed a "Big Bang" event, and there is no data that we have yet discovered to contradict such a conclusion!.

Secondly, what you are doing in posing your question is deifying the Big Bang!. If you want to CALL the Big Bang "God", then you're certainly welcome to it!. But it wouldn't be the bearded, benevolent, conscious entity that most people think of when they say, "God", and most of them would say you're misusing the term!. You can call a stone or a twig "God" if you like!. Nothing's stopping you!. But don't then think that all the properties commonly associated with a lay notion of "God" will accompany the twig, the stone, or the Big Bang!.

Lastly, the Big Bang only "transcends" time, space, energy, and mass insofar as the constituents involved in a Big-Bang event would be more fundamental than time, space, energy, and mass (x and y bosons, or strings, or whatever-you-like)!. That doesn't mean that it isn't fundamentally "of" the physical universe!.

Attributing extra-physical, supernatural properties to the Big Bang would be an extremely weird move -- though you're free to do it if you like!. People believe that Mary was a virgin (yeah right), even though she gave birth to Jesus -- and thereby attribute supernatural properties to him!. But deifying a scientific theory -- it sort of goes against the grain of science and religion both!.

Think about it like this: consider the state of the universe five minutes before the present moment (never mind complications arising from relativity -- that would be irrelevant to the point)!. Everything that exists in this moment and every moment in the future was "caused by" that moment five minutes ago!. Would it seem reasonable to regard "the state of the universe five minutes ago" as God!? Presumably not!.

Well, there's no better reason to consider the Big Bang God!. It is unclear what -- if anything -- existed prior to the Big Bang!. It is plausible to suppose that Big Bangs are a cyclical occurance!. So the universe collapses into some sort of singularity, which causes a Big Bang, which causes a new physical universe, which collapses into some sort of singularity, which causes another Big Bang, and so on!.!.!.

The point is that there is no reason to attribute to the Big Bang any properties that aren't purely material!. That is, if you are trying to use science to get to a religious conclusion -- you're not gonna get there!. There's nothing wrong with having a religious outlook!. I disagree with such views, personally, but you're certainly entitled to believe what you like!. But if you want to use a scientific method, apply it to some scientific domain like physics, to get to some sort of a religious answer -- it just ain't gonna happen!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

well how exactly can nothing become everything!?
and the theory that it was two gases colliding is crap, as how could they move / float / attract towards each other, when there was no space to move in, as it hadn't been created yet!?

but yeah, i believe god created all this

it would be a little weird that gases could create a universe, galaxies, suns, planets, moons, and even life (including us)Www@QuestionHome@Com

In the pop of a bubble
In the crack of a shell
In the blink of an eye
In the drop of a tear
In the break of a heart
God can be found
In little things

In the ablaze of the Sun
In the glaze of the Moon
In the twinkle of a star
In the break of a dawn
In the radiant mists
In gradient skies
In sparkling eyes
God can be found
In brighter things

In the clang of a mountain
In the crunch of ice
In the crack of thunder
In the rumble of a cloud
In the sweep of wind
The whiff of breeze
In the spatter of rain
God can be found
In mighty things

In the whiz of a sense
In the rush of a feeling
In the torrent of a thought
In the joys of a union
In the pang of parting
In the company of love
God can be found
In simple thingsWww@QuestionHome@Com

You go wrong on point 3!.

That which is the cause of and transcends Space, Time, Energy & Mass is!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.no-one knows!. Christians have the belief that it is God but it's not proven, it's only belief as one answerer said!.

Scientists aren't trying to disprove God, they arfe trying to find out how we all came to be!. To just say "it was God" will not satisfy nor prove to everyone the reason why we are here!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Since the"big bang" is a theory ,not a fact, and all theories are "man made", I guess it would depend on what you think 'GOD' is!. After all,thoughts about what runs the universe and creation are just that 'thoughts"!. Something that is all powerful would not be limited to mere thoughts like man!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

the big bang is just a theory, there was no big bang!.!.!.because before big bang there was nothing!.!.!.!.but an infinitely small and dense stuff !.!.!.how could this stuff bangs !.!.!.if there was no medium!.!.no nothing !.!.!.but itself!?!?!? I am no astrophysicist but common sense!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

If that is your definition of God then it will be true for you!. Whether it is actually true, I don't think we'll ever know!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

That is what the Jesuit who worked on the first Big Bang theory project thought!. However, I don't think the Big Bang says anything about God's existence or nonexistence!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

The big bang is a theory, not a proven fact!. You can't use one theory to prove another theory!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

G Syllogisms are often sillygisms!. This is an example of that!.
The big bang was a big bounce and that destroys the concept of item 1!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

big bang is just a theory!.

maybe this all is way bigger then what we think!.

its quite possible that all our known universe is just a cell in an organ of a huge divine being!.

Www@QuestionHome@Com

There is no proof of God!. There is only belief!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

the proof og GOD is what you feel not what you can see!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

our lives itself and everything is the proof of god!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

What is your definition of God!. First is to find out that!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

your being here is proof!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

There was no Big-Bang!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

where was god before the big bang then!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

your argument doesn't make senseWww@QuestionHome@Com