Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Non-existence has the propensity of existence and existence has the propensity oQuestion: Non-existence has the propensity of existence and existence has the propensity of non-existence!. True or false!? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: you need to study the work of Bertrand Russel!. He is the only philosopher who has proven that "nothing" exists both in the real world and in mathematics!. It is too long to explain the find points of the disseration but in general nothing is the dividing line between energy and matter and the transformation of one to the other goes thru "nothing"Www@QuestionHome@Com Logic will root out confusion--it's like a can of Raid in those commercials!. Non-existence is either an event or a state, depending on its placement in your statement!. "The state of non-existence has the propensity of suffering the event of existence, and the state of existence has the propensity of suffering the event of non-existence!." That's what you are really saying!. But does it work the other way around!? Not really, so this is the better answer!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Well they both exist,since everything is bipolar!. At least conceptually!. But in a more empirical approach, existence is basically everything there is,so non-existence makes no sense!. If things don't exist,there's no need to name them,therefore creating a name to the fact that things don't exist makes no sense - in my perspective,but I know this is arguable!.Www@QuestionHome@Com If A than B does not mean if B than A ex: if it rains the ground is wet if the ground is wet it does not necessarily mean that it has rained even when it FEELS like it did!.!.!. This is called a circle reasing and in defenition is never fully correct and can surely never be answered with true or false!.!.!. Such statements are useful to think about not to get an answer!. That is why it is called philosophy and why philosophy remains INTERESTING for thousends of yearsWww@QuestionHome@Com Of contingent existence, yes; this is true!. Of necessary existence, no; this is false!. God is the necessary being, for example, and couldn't ever not exist!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Buenas Dias Hector!.!.!. Well!.!.!.when there is nothing "there"!.!.!.I assume it doesn't exist!.!.!.Logical, right!? So I guess your "estimation" is True, my dear! Wishing you a Happy Thanksgiving and all my love!.!.!.your friend!.!.!.Annette***Www@QuestionHome@Com What do you mean by "propensity"!? Things "exist" if they're there!. They "don't exist" if they're not!. Www@QuestionHome@Com Neither, to be either a statement must not be self contradictory!. Www@QuestionHome@Com Since your reality is a duality, true!Www@QuestionHome@Com Nothing can be added or subtracted from what is but love by its nature is expansive!.Www@QuestionHome@Com wtf!?Www@QuestionHome@Com |