Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> Is this further proof that evolution is a false concept? I can give more informa


Question: Is this further proof that evolution is a false concept!? I can give more information, but its long though :)!.!.!?
Darwin's evolutionary theory has way too many holes and even violates many laws of phyics (especially thermodynamics)!. Scientists even have tried creating additional laws (which are not accepted nor proven) to reconile the problems with evolution and thermodynamics!.

"In the late 19th century, thermodynamicist Ludwig Boltzmann argued that the fundamental object of contention in the life-struggle in the evolution of the organic world is 'available energy'!. Since then, over the years, various thermodynamic researchers have come forward to ascribed to or to postulate potential fourth laws of thermodynamics; in some cases, there are even fifth or sixth laws of thermodynamics supposed!. The majority of these tentative fourth law statements are attempts to reconcile the thermodynamics with evolution, predominantly!. Most fourth law statements, however, are speculative and far from agreed upon!.

The most common proposed Fourth Law is the Onsager reciprocal relations!. Another example is the maximum power principle as put forward initially by biologist Alfred Lotka in his 1922 article Contributions to the Energetics of Evolution!.[3] Most variations of hypothetical fourth laws (or principles) have to do with the environmental sciences, biological evolution, or galactic phenomenon!."

"http://en!.wikipedia!.org/
wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics"

I have heard another interesting theory based around the fact that the human skull continues to grow our entire lives!. If you were to compare the skull of an 80 year old man and what his skull looked like at age 20, they would have some drastic differences!. For one it would be thicker and have a bigger frontal bone, giving a slight ape like look!. What would it look like if that 80 year old man lived to say 800 years!? In the Old testament, several people lived well above 200 years old!. What if those bones we find aren't a different species, but are just those of our ancestors who lived extremely long lives!?


I have a bunch of other stuff i can give you to point out the holes in evolution!. Till then, peace my ape brothers and sisters :)Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
Religious people have an explaination of where we came from!.
Those without a religion do not!.
For this reason, evolution became their religion!. Because it violates many scientific laws, it takes FAITH to believe that evolution is correct!.

I don't see a problem with them trying to find scientific ways that we came to be!.!.!.just make sure that they're SCIENTIFIC!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Evolution and the Second law of Thermodynamics do not coincide or contradict each other!.

The Second Law of thermodynamics has to do with entropy and conservation of energy!.

Evolution has to do with genetic mutations and adaptability over long periods of time!.

Honestly, if anything, evolution increases entropy, making it more verifiable by the second law of thermodynamics!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Wow you did a lot of work on this question!. Pity it was a waste of time and effort!.

I think that the 1000's of well educated scientists from every culture will have missed the points you make!. I think not!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

No, hypothetical supposition does not constitute refutation of an otherwise experimentally verifiable concept!.

There are not "drastic" difference between the skulls of an 80 year old and the skill of a 20 year old!.

There is no medical support for the declaration of the ancients living 200 years (http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Life_expect!.!.!.

Natural selection is experimentally verifiable!.
Inheritance of traits is experimentally verifiable!.
Random mutations are observable phenomenae!. If you want someplace for God to fit, this is where it is!.
Modern evolutionary theory (http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Modern_evol!.!.!. is predominantly genetic; considered and expanded by the knowledge gained from modern biochemistry and biomechanics!. Do you sincerely believe that modern scientists could get away with putting forward ideas that do not survive the scrutiny of their peers (like for basic violations of physics)!?!?Www@QuestionHome@Com