| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Do you think Nietzsche's philosophy was too dark and terminal?Question: Do you think Nietzsche's philosophy was too dark and terminal!? Most of Nietzsche's work was intended to promote self inspiration and creativity from people, but at times his philosophy seems too dark and futile!. Do you think in a way the result of much of what he preaches contradicts with his intentions for his philosophy!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: On the contrary!. Nietzsche is not dark!. He perceives Christianity as being dark, pessimistic, pure pathos, based on suffering!. His philosophy, rather, is based on the affirmation of life!. Existentialism was derived from Nietzsche, which is another philosophy that is misinterpreted as "dark, pessimistic"!. It's basically the same idea, but watered down!. This is the only life we have, so let's not treat it like it's dirty and full of evil and sin while imagining a heaven!. I don't know where you got pessimistic and dark, because those ideas are not there at all!.Www@QuestionHome@Com First of all, you are either insane or taken Nietzsche's words for something else if you think Nietzsche is dark or pessimistic!. In fact, Nietzsche is the exact opposite!. He is endlessly optimistic, even in a Quixotic sense!. His philosophy: eternal resurrection, self-overcoming, and the idea of superman, just to name a few, are proclamations of extreme euphoria!. Heck, how can you take Nietzsche's almost sadistic derivative of eternal enjoyment as something sad or unhappy!? This guy is way too happy, way too happy to the extent that he authored Gay Science!. Read that book, and you will understand the nature of happiness in a Nietzschean sense!. But in retrospect, I do think Nietzsche was kind of perverted in his philosophy!. He saw no moderation and no beauty in any form of pragmatic actions, recall that he called pragmatism the heavy feet of english women!. Schopenhauer is what you call Dark and Terminal!. He was Nietzsche's favorite when Nietzsche was young!. Www@QuestionHome@Com I don't pretend to understand Nietzsche - he's way over my head at times!. I'm not sure that his work "was intended to promote self-inspiration and creativity;" while he most certainly speaks about things that are life enhancing and rejects pettiness, he also speaks of decadence and the last man!. Regarding "decadence:" it isn't clear to me that a lot of what we do today would escape that critique!. Our taste for particular themes and modes of popular music, for example, would probably be eviscerated just as Wagner was: http://www!.ashokkarra!.com/2008/07/toward!.!.!. I think the "result" of his preaching - I mean, I can't even use the word "preaching," it implies "dogma," - stems from misreadings of Nietzsche!. I'm ultimately with you: I think there is something life-affirming about Nietzsche!. But I'm going to have to shed a lot more assumptions about the world I'm in before I see it properly!.Www@QuestionHome@Com As you likely know, little Friedrich was called "the Preacher" by his classmates, for his penchant of preaching to his classmates from the Bible!. And, when he unexpectedly lost his Pastor Father, he began to opine that "God is dead, died of pity!." When he precognitively dreamed that his younger brother died, and then his little brother suddenly did, this didn't help matters much!. After encountering Schopenhauer as a young professor of classical language, Fred adopted basically the same "Man's Search for Meaning" is "The Artist as a Young Man" shtick, until finding Zarathustra as tough-love sock-puppet for the Great Escape, later reduxed as Maslow's hierarchy of needs and self-actualization!. Karl Jaspers, the psychiatrist-philosopher, noted early Nietzsche's poetry as prefiguring the arc of his life, e!.g!. his poem about serving the unknown God!. When Nietzsche had exhausted the categories (genius, anti-Christ, etc!.), he concluded his trip by walking meekly around his mother's home, clothed in a fine white linen robe!. So, to view the philosophy of Nietzsche in the context of his own life, is to understand a tragic sense of life, a tale full of sound and fury!. What is appealing, besides all that, is that Nietzsche's loss of faith precedes a similar path in European society!. Sartre's "for oneself" is essentially, or should one say, "existentially," Nietzsche's path toward Schopenhauerian self-actualization, with a more logical epistemic position, i!.e!., how does the grownup germ know anything save the relative flux of a supervenient worldline!? (By knowing Self as reflecting God, Plato's and Plotinus' answer, but incomprehensible to the techne-conditioned modern European who does not apply some energy toward meditation, self-realization, and contemplation!.) "A Philosophy of Universality," O!. M!. Aivanhov, "Nihilism," Father Seraphim Rose, "The Path of the Higher Self," Mark Prophet!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Nietzsche lived out his philosophy and died broke, insane, and alone at a relatively young age!. So yes, I believe that it is obvious that his philosophy is both terminal and dark!. Www@QuestionHome@Com He is more cheerful than Schopenhauer!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Yes!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Nietzsche’s works were poured out in a manner some find unstructured!. As with many great minds and philosophers of his ilk, he underwent periods of angst, rage and anger att the suffering in the world!. Such wise minds have a close proximity to super consciousness, whilst dwelling amongst the ordinary in a multi dimensional cosmos!. His anger undoubtedly pours forth, his love for Germany and the loathing for its violence meted upon Jews, causing his humanity and reason to override a deep seated patriotic virtue!. Life is complex, as is mankind and we wonder the omnipotence and omnipresence of a God who is glaring remiss by his absence!. He concluded God is dead, I have witnessed this, the erosion of humanity and love in society orchestrated by the greed willed powers who do not require love in it what is a rabble of industrial fodder, human cattle born and educated to serve a purpose and then to die,, unthinking, unfeeling, accorded mod cons, and as much peace as is required to perform!. The warring for dominance in his time occurs in this age, one cannot, with any sincerity of conviction, criticise Nietzsche is one understanding his circumstance, his ethic and his outlook!. He as with Jesus before him, was plagued by demons, sometimes obviously so, and carried his Overman or the greater soul as an immense weight, born with love than any support, a 'god ' that itself could not overcome the vice like grip of the evil attached and feeding from its soul!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |