Position:Home>Philosophy> Can someone give me a non-theistic/non-

Now in his writings Darwin suggested that the civilized would wipe out the uncivilized (survival of tooth and claw etc!.) and Nietzsche said that "The morality of 'equal rights' is a herd morality, and because it opposes the cultivation of superior individuals, it leads to the corruption of the human species"!.

Definition of slavery:
By slavery I will refer to the Roman enslavement, for life and the other person as property to be used or disposed of solely at the digression of the owner!. The individuals in the owner would be from the stronger, more dominant group/race!. * If you would like to propose an alternative idea of slavery such as that found in Israel where the slave was released at the 7th year that is a welcome alternative!.

Part!.1
So given those constraints can anyone come up with a reason why it would be wrong for a stronger race (weapons, numbers, technology!.!.) to commit genocide and enslave the survivors!? In lower species we see the improvement through the dominant and superior specimens reducing or eliminating the inferior or their options to reproduce!.


Part!.2
If you choose a reason, what are you using as a basis of your concept of it being wrong/right!?

Just so you don't think I am excluding the theistic answers on prejudice I think C!.S!. Lewis summed it up in his statement "Christ died for men precisely because men are not worth dying for; to make them worth it!.", if you have more to add I would be interested too!.

Thanks
BaiWww@QuestionHome@Com

---

---