My teacher asked these questions of me and I really don't know what to make of them!.
What is wrong with using a subjective certainty as a touchstone of truth!?
What does objective certainty come to!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Philosophy buffs, I need your help!?Question: Philosophy buffs, I need your help!!? My teacher asked these questions of me and I really don't know what to make of them!.
What is wrong with using a subjective certainty as a touchstone of truth!? What does objective certainty come to!?Www@QuestionHome@Com Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Subjectivity is feeling based Objectivity is evidence based Anything that is subjective will be ripped to shreds with logic if remotely possible If you use objectivity you will have evidence !.!.!. logic has no leg to stand on !.!.!.just make sure the evidence is obtained from reliable, accepted sources!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Substitute the words "to me" and "in fact" and the distinction between subjective and objective will become clear!. Yet, by definition, I believe "truth" is objective, and can not be qualified with "to me"!. The notion of Truth connotes certain universal properties that must be considered objective and not subjective!. Hence, it would seem that a certainty that does not meet this universal criterion, and is therefore subjective, is not a "Truth" in the sense that it is true in all cases at all times!. In fact, the qualification "to me" admits itself of lacking the universality that objective "Truth" requires!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Along with what's been said before, it is well to note that "subjective" is feeling, intuitive, personal, soulful, and that "objective" is mental, focussed on atom-based observation, impersonal!. Science is an example, the major example, of objective facticity!. The truth of an omelet or a sunny day may be emotional, subjective, personal, poetic, but the facts of how to go about making an omelet or what astronomical bodies and physics result in a sunny day are based on observations of atom-based facticity!. What is wrong with using only objective certainty is that a woman may gain the whole world and lose her soul!. "Expecting Adam," Martha Beck, "The Great Divorce," C!. S!. Lewis, "The Overachievers," Alexandra Robbins, "Extraordinary Knowing," Dr!. Elizabeth Mayer "For Women Only," Shaunti Feldhahn, "University of Destruction," David Wheaton, and "Soul Mates and Twin Flames," Elizabeth Clare Prophet, are worthwhile balances in a focus on objectivity as the basic good!. http://www!.integralscience!.org http://www!.noetic!.org http://www!.heartmath!.org http://noosphere!.princeton!.edu http://www!.divinecosmos!.com http://www!.quantumbrain!.org http://www!.tiller!.org http://www!.sheldrake!.org http://www!.tcm!.phy!.cam!.ac!.uk/~bdj10 It is also worthwhile to note that some of the basic concepts in the most objective and numerically accurate science, physics, are in fact non-objective!. E!.g!., "infinity" is a metaphysical concept, as it can never be measured!. ("The Visible and the Invisible: Matter and Mind in Physics," Wolfram Schommers, Ph!.D; "The Mindful Universe," Henry P!. Stapp, Ph!.D!.; "Creative Evolution," Amit Goswami, Ph!.D!.)Www@QuestionHome@Com First look up the definition of subjective and objective!.!.!. Subjective means that you believe in it!.!.!. meaning that others may Not agree!. Objective means the facts!. No one can argue a fact!. There is nothing to argue!.Www@QuestionHome@Com A subjective certainty is not universally or objectively verifiable and so is more readily dismissed by those not making the original subjective judgment!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |