Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> Is it true what they say about girls with bad breath?


Question: Is it true what they say about girls with bad breath!?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
yup sure isWww@QuestionHome@Com

That depends on what grounds you want to build the question!? Yes and no!
For example if here breath smells than whoaaa that would be a dipper!
But, yeah its true that its true if its true to be true about that what its said, and what I pointed out earlier that indeed its truly true being truly true about the true that the facts are true to be true and that is truly true accordingly with the factual true!.
AAAAND nooo, it is a false statment according to this article on logical fallacies writen by Marilyn vos Savant the genius recorded as the woman with the Highest IQ in the world(print friendly/or free/ version)

Logical Fallacies

Readers often ask about critical thinking and how to reason better!. One of the best ways is to learn about logic, which is both fun and useful!. Following are examples of the most common logical fallacies!. You can use them as exercises to find the flaws in your own thinking!.

Printer-friendly version


Simple errors arising from ambiguity!.

The same word may be used in different senses (called equivocation): “Marriage is a subject of great gravity, so getting married will make us gain weight!.” Or a sentence construction may produce a double meaning (amphiboly): “We’re having some friends for dinner!.” Or a word may be emphasized inappropriately (accent): Contrast “I just love my dog!” with “I just love my dog!” Or words that are similar in form may not be similar in sense (figure of speech): “Does he have cold feet!?” Who asked: Your husband’s mother or his doctor!?!

Confusing the parts with the whole!.

We may mistakenly assume that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole (composition): “A chimpanzee is an intelligent animal and even grasps certain numerical concepts, such as the difference between one and two!. So a dozen chimpanzees probably would be able to divide a dozen bananas among themselves equally!.” Not too likely, right!?! But what about this!? “Every member of a congressional committee is bright and understands fiscal policy!. So the committee likely would be able to successfully restructure the country’s fiscal policy!.” It’s the same fallacy!.

And sometimes we assume that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts (division): “A group of musicians is wildly popular!. Therefore, if they break up, each will be wildly popular!.” Of course, that’s incorrect!. But how about this!? “A corporation consisting of several subsidiaries produces goods of high quality and is profitable!. Therefore, each subsidiary can be expected to produce goods of high quality and be profitable!.” Again, it’s the same fallacy!.

Considering the form of an argument!.

We’ve all heard of “if-then” arguments: If this is so, then that must be so!. One source of error is assuming “this” defines the only way in which “that” can occur (affirming the consequent): “If a person has full-blown AIDS, then his or her T-cell count will be low!.” True!. But the following is false: “A person has a low T-cell count!. Thus, he or she has AIDS!.” Other conditions cause low T-cell counts!. A twin error occurs in the opposite manner (denying the antecedent): “A person does not have AIDS!. Thus, he or she does not have a low T-cell count!.” False, and for the same reason: Other conditions cause low T-cell counts!.

Learning about deductive reasoning!.

Have you ever heard this!? “Every man is mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal!.” It’s a famous “syllogism,” a form of deductive reasoning that consists of a major premise, a minor premise, a “middle,”and a conclusion!. (The “middle” appears in both premises, linking them!.)

An error occurs when the middle contains a term used in two different senses (four terms): “Wool coats shrink if they get wet!. Sheep have wool coats!. Thus, sheep get smaller when they stand in the rain!.” Obvious, right!? But what about this!? “Many people pay no taxes!. The working class is composed of many people!. Thus, the working class pays no taxes!.” Obviously wrong!

Or the middle term may be used inappropriately to link the two premises (undistributed middle): “Truffles often are found by dogs trained to locate them by scent!. Illegal drugs often are found by dogs trained to locate them by scent!. Thus, truffles are often illegal drugs!.” Oops! This is wrong, just as wrong as the following!. “Executives often are ambitious and want to make a lot of money!. Criminals often are ambitious and want to make a lot of money!. Thus, successful executives are criminals!.”

One error occurs when the conclusion is broader than the major premise allows (illicit major): “Politicians are actually reasonable people and not biased nitwits!. All politicians are human beings!. Therefore, no human beings are unreasonable or biased nitwits!.” Another error occurs when the conclusion is broader than the minor premise allows (illicit minor): “Politicians love power!. All politicians are human beings!. Therefore, all human beings love power!.”

Considering the fabric of an argumentWww@QuestionHome@Com

It seems that they are wrong as a kiss is more about passion than judgement!. If a girl is planning to have a good night then she will do as much as she can to make herself look good and will not have bad breath!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

girls with bad breath do not swallow alot of ***!. Its true because *** is known to clean your mouth!. If you don't believe me, look it up!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Who are "THEY" and what did "THEY" say about girls with bad breath!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

Is that a philosophical question!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

yes, its true, they need breath mints!Www@QuestionHome@Com

I am not aware of what "they" say!?!Www@QuestionHome@Com

use MiswakWww@QuestionHome@Com

What do they say!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

this isnt a !? your just ignorant Www@QuestionHome@Com

It depends on what they say, stupid!.Www@QuestionHome@Com