Help with this logic proof!. Must use only replacement rules!. No inference rules or other assumptions!. I'm stuck!. I'm told it should take no more than 16 lines!.
Premise: (~P v Q) v (~P ^ Q)
Conclusion: ~P v QWww@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Prove replacement only?Question: Prove replacement only!? Help with this logic proof!. Must use only replacement rules!. No inference rules or other assumptions!. I'm stuck!. I'm told it should take no more than 16 lines!.
Premise: (~P v Q) v (~P ^ Q) Conclusion: ~P v QWww@QuestionHome@Com Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: 1!. (~P v Q) v (~P ? Q) 2!. ( (~P v Q) v (~P) ) ? ( (~P v Q) v Q) !.!.!.!.!.!. 1 Distribution 3!. ( ( Q v ~P ) v (~P) ) ? ( (~P v Q) v Q) !.!.!.!.!. 2 Commutativity 4!. ( Q v (~P v ~P) ) ? ( ~P v (Q v Q) ) !.!.!.!.!. 3 Associativity 5!. ( Q v (~P) ) ? ( ~P v (Q) ) !.!.!.!.!. 4 Tautology 6!. ( ~P v Q ) ? ( ~P v Q ) !.!.!.!.!. 5 Commutativity 7!. ~P v Q !.!.!.!.!. 6 TautologyWww@QuestionHome@Com |