If the law of non-contradiction did not apply, it could at the same time apply too!. This means that if it applies, that does not mean it does not not apply!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Is my reasoning sound? Why (not)?Question: Is my reasoning sound!? Why (not)!? If the law of non-contradiction did not apply, it could at the same time apply too!. This means that if it applies, that does not mean it does not not apply!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: The law on non-contradiction is basically the fundamental start for most reasoning!. Something cannot both be X and not X at the same time!. This law can't be proved without using the law itself!. It can be argued for, but it can't be logically proved!. As far as your statement goes!.!.!. Yes, if the law did not apply, then it would follow that something could be both X and not X!. So it could apply at the same time!. And yes, your second conclusion would be applicable by the first!. However, like I stated before, this law can't be thought about with logic because it can't be proven!.!.!. so is an assumption, not a logical conclusion!. Using logic on this statement ends up in perversion!. Philosophers say that you can only prove this law by showing the person that they already depend on it!.Www@QuestionHome@Com You are torquing us around!! There is little point in positing paradoxes of imagined value!. :-pWww@QuestionHome@Com see!? all you idiots who think that i was wrong with 'philosophers' who try and sound intelligent by adding double triple negatives in a question within a question, need to get out in the real world a little more! how many!? HOW MANY TIMES have i stated that this is EXACTLY what 'philosophers' do!? man, am i ever wrong!? am i just that good!? am i pretty much omnipotent!? no!. but when it comes to predicting the lowest level of mediocrity, it will ALWAYS be associated with a 'philosopher'!. this question is a perfect example of what someone who has taken a philosophy course or has a 'philosophy' degree 'thinks' about while they are serving fries, cleaning out vomit in the bathroom and going back to their studio apartment that is shared by 12 other heroin addicts!. hahahahahahahahaha!!! ohhhh!!!!! hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! omg!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! yeah, this being a 'serious, deep and intellectual' philosophy question is about as intellectual as the hemorrhoids i need to desperately scratch!!! don't worry, pal!. i NEVER feel 'humbled' by anyone who has 'studied' philosophy or 'think' they have gained any form of 'higher' intelligence from 'philosophy!!! one more laugh!!! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! H A ! great, i just pee'd myself!Www@QuestionHome@Com Wow! That hurt my brain!. I had to read it about 50 times to understand it!. But, I do agree with your reasoning!. I think that this is all a matter of your point of view!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |