Question Home

Position:Home>History> Were roman women allowed to be politicians during republican period in tome?


Question: Were roman women allowed to be politicians during republican period in tome!?
could roman women be politicians in ancient rome!?
quick please and very detailed!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
no!. women were not even allowed to be in the early olympics!. they were expected to clean the house, care for the children, and obey all the rules of the man of the house!. if she ever tried to change a man's opinion, she would be put to death!. usually they were tortured by dunking their head under water over and over again until they drowned!.
but the answer to your question is no!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Roman women, relative to the rest of the world, were the freest women in the world, and the Roman civilization would set a benchmark for women's rights that wouldn't be surpassed until the 20th century!.

Women in Rome were considered to have been quite capable of virtue and honor!. Livy speaks at length of the great deeds of many women, including one who sneaked into an enemy camp that was besieging Rome and making away with several dozen captives!. The Rape of the Sabine also demonstrates the virtue of women!. While Romans did capture and forcefully marry the women away, such behavior would not have been unusual in those times!. But what was unique was the Roman women's heroism to charge onto the battlefield to stop their husbands from fighting their brothers and fathers!.

Women had many rights in Rome!. They were allowed to own businesses, allowed to attend the games, allowed to travel without their husbands, hire the services of a prostitute, and had their own section of the public bathes where they were allowed to bathe!. They were even allowed to become gladiators, and female gladiators became a hot ticket attraction in the games!. Roman mosaics have shown women, in bikinis, playing sports and exercising!.

It is true that they were completely answerable to the eldest male of the family, the pater familias, but that is true of everyone in the family, not just the women!.

In fact, when Romans married, instead of our tradition of women marrying into the man's family and adopting his name, it was the exact opposite in Rome!. In ancient Rome, Men married into their wife's family, and took the name of their wife's family!. For example, when a young man from the Aemilius family married the granddaughter of Scipio Africanus, his name was changed to Scipio Africanus Aemilianus, literally "Scipio Africanus of the Aemilius tribe", in honor of his Grandfather in law!.

But women were denied a few things!. They were forbidden from enlisting in the military, forbidden from voting, and forbidden from holding office!. However, Roman honor was such that the reason that they forbid their women from doing these things was not for the same reasons that they were denied them in the modern era!. In the modern era, it was a result of a misguided dedication to "natural" gender roles as defined by the Christian religion, with women subservient to their husbands!. Undoubtedly those beliefs existed in ancient Rome, but the Romans took a very serious view of both politics and warfare, understanding them as ugly but necessary institutions!. A Roman would have been aghast at the idea of subjecting a woman to the horrors of warfare, and the Germanic tribes would occasionally capitalize on that by sending their women into battle in order to unnerve the Roman men, whose screeching cries as they were cut down would haunt the Roman soldiers!. Politics, especially Roman politics, were quite ugly affairs!. backstabs, conspiracies, backdoor plotting, bribery, blackmail!. The Roman men would have considered it disgraceful for a woman to be subjected to this kind of world!.

However, as it is often said, the real power is behind the throne!. Women could become very important, if informal, members of the ruling class!. They had money and loyalties to their family, and women could become powerful and influential matriarchs!.

Thus, by 21st century standards, women were quite repressed!. However, by the standards of the contemporaries of Rome, they had unrivaled liberty!. Women in Athens weren't even allowed to leave their house, Carthaginians and Persians treated women like cattle, and in China women were expected to walk ten paces behind their husbands!. There were laws that were designed to keep women in line, but in light of Roman art, including graffiti, we must conclude that what was practiced was not what was preached!. The fact that they've found graffiti written by women ("soandso knocked me up!") indicates that women, even in the lower classes, received an education!. And the fact that recovered art work depicts women doing everything from shopping to fighting in the games to running a store to playing sports, we must conclude that Roman men kept alive the Etruscan tradition of adoring their wives!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

No, women were never allowed to hold public office in ancient Rome!. But read this for more information:

http://www!.womenintheancientworld!.com/wo!.!.!.

(That water torture and death nonsense in the previous answer is just that---nonsense)Www@QuestionHome@Com

But there were exceptions -- look at Livia and Octavia!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

If you are a woman you do not want to go to the past!. You will have almost no rights!. If you try something the men of the past will get you!.Www@QuestionHome@Com