Question Home |
Position:Home>History> Is violence necessary in a revolution?Question: Is violence necessary in a revolution!? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Ever heard of Gandhi!?Www@QuestionHome@Com Not at all!. First of all, you have to define what constitutes a real "revolution!." They can be!.!.!.!.shifts in government, so yeah, "voting" can effectively be "revolutionizing"!.!.!.!.depending on how different the president is!. Or, look at the Glorious Revolution!. Parliament asked William of Orange to come and invade England and get rid of the king!. He showed up with an army, but never had to use it because the king fled to France, and Parliament simply chose him to be their new ruler along with his wife!. There are also cultural revolutions, such as the Enlightenment!.Www@QuestionHome@Com no look at the orange revolution in the ukraine the velvet revolution in czechoslovakia the green revolution of the 70s the scientific revolutionWww@QuestionHome@Com No The greatest revolution of our generation is the discovery that human beings, by changing the inner attitudes of their minds, can change the outer aspects of their livesWww@QuestionHome@Com I don't think it's necessary, but It happens anyways!.!.!. Throughout history, change has brought violence!.!.!. Www@QuestionHome@Com yes because without violence you cant prove your point and they wont think that your serious about the revolutionWww@QuestionHome@Com No a vote for president is a revolution!.Www@QuestionHome@Com not when there's opportunity for velvet rebellionWww@QuestionHome@Com YesWww@QuestionHome@Com noWww@QuestionHome@Com |