How does John Adams feel about those who protested against the stamp act?

Question: How does John Adams feel about those who protested against the stamp act!?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:

~He doesn't feel much of anything about it!. He's been dead for more than 200 years!.

How he felt about it and what he said about it are probably two very different things!. He and his cousin same are just two of the tax cheats and smugglers who got rich off ignoring and breaking the law as Parliament overlooked their antics during the period Parliament pursued the policy of Salutary Neglect!. When the Seven Years War crippled the British economy, Parliament decided it was high time the colonials picked up a small portion of the cost of their upkeep!. That minor theater of the war in North America called the French and Indian War cost dearly and new taxes were enacted to defray some but by no means all of the costs!.

The new taxes replaced older ones!. In many cases, the new taxes were lower than the ones they replaced!. What galled the likes of John Hancock and Patrick Henry and the Adams boys and their crew was not the taxes!. It was the fact that Parliament actually had the effrontery to enforce collection this time around!.

Adams was a lower!. He knew "Taxation without Representation" was a bogus slogan!. He knew that under British Parliamentary government of the day, he had as much representation as did a barrister in London!. The colonies were represented to the self-same degree as were their countrymen on the home isles!. That is probably the reason no colony or colonial legislative body ever asked that a colonial representative be elected or appointed to Parliament!. He also knew that the British people enjoyed the most personal liberty and personal freedom and rights that any society had enjoyed since the days of Classical Athens!.

The colonists who supported the cause of independence and separation from Great Britain were in it for money and power, not to get out from under the boot of tyranny or unjust taxes or legislation!. At the height of the movement, only 1/3 of the colonists did support the cause, explaining why the Lee Resolution of July 2, 1776 by which the Second Continental Congress purported to declare independence - or the follow-up attempt at justification of hat treasonous act, the Declaration of Independence - was never put to "We the People" for a vote!. It would have been defeated resoundingly!. So much for listening to the voice of the people or giving them representation!. The Canadian colonies were invited to join the insurrection!. They flatly refused!. The oppression from home must have been severe for them to do that, don't you think!?

The actions and words of the traitors, especially at the Philadelphia (Constitutional) Convention in 1787 prove clearly what their goals were in the decade before!. What they did to the Loyalists after independence was achieved and granted to the colonies in 1783 by the Treaty of Paris is equally telling about their belief in personal liberty, the right of expression and the right to personal political beliefs!. In each of the thirteen newly created independent nations, Loyalists were terrorized and driven out!.

Of course when Adams himself represented the defendants in the "Boston Massacre" trials, he learned what his fellow rabble rousers really thought about the right to a trial by jury!. His life, property and family were threatened!. Imagine the angst when he what really happened at trial!. An armed mob of up several hundred threatened and attacked a lone sentry!. His office, Capt Thomas Preston went to his aid with a squad of seven men!. They too were attacked!. The standing order was that no musket could be loaded until an officer determined that a situation was so serious that the safety or lives of the men were in jeopardy and there was no recourse, including withdrawal, but to meet the danger with force!. Preston and his men were surrounded!. They were being pelted with stones, razor sharp oyster shells, ice balls and beaten with clubs!. He ordered the men to load!. Members of the mob began yelling "Fire"!. A trooper was knocked to the ground and clubbed!. He got up!. A musket went off!. Eleven of the rioters were hit, some by ricochets of the street or walls!. Five, including at least one hit by ricochet, died!. One of the mortally wounded made a dying declaration that the the soldiers acted in self-defense!. Preston had positioned himself between the mob and his men!. He could not have ordered them to shoot because he was directly in the line of fire!. He did, however, order them to stop shooting he was applauded later by the citizens of Boston for stopping the incident and restoring order!. The troopers were commended for the remarkable restraint they had exercised by that same citizenry!. Adams won acquittals for Preston and seven of his men!. Two others were acquitted of murder but convicted of manslaughter!. The jurors were citizens of the Massachusetts countryside!. Cousin Sam never forgave John for that!. It was Sam, one of the instigators of the riot and inciters of the mob, who gave the incident the name "Boston Massacre" and circulated the malicious lies and untruths of the event throughout the colonies!.

Learn your real history rather than the myths taught in you text!. The biased accounts of those traitors who fomented the treason are replete with lies, distorted fact and twisted truth!. Unfortunately, they are still taught as factual 'history'!. The falsehoods and distortions start with the name!. A revolution is a movement to overthrow and replace an existing government!. That was never the colonial intention!. The minority who supported the cause only wanted to separated from the existing government and create thirteen independent nations, each with its own new government!. War for independence!? Yes!. Civil war!? Yes!. Revolution!? not by any reasonable use of logic or language!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

I doubt he is giving it a lot of thought at the moment!.Www@QuestionHome@Com