Question Home

Position:Home>History> Would you say that former black slaves in the US?


Question: Would you say that former black slaves in the US!?
Were forced into natural selection due to their circumstance!? Would you also say that this is why they are the predominant players in sports such as football, among other!? Would you also be able to conclude that if it weren’t for their ancestors’ enslavement, they would not be the highly paid sports stars they have become!?Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
You've had some pretty good answers!. We are all products of our civilization!. The tougher it is on us, the tougher we become until we finally succumb to death and extinction or become fitter!. The whole world practiced slavery at one point in history with the conquerors enslaving the conquered!. The Europeans did it, the Chinese did it, the Middle East did it, Africa did it, the American Indians practiced it, South America practiced it!. It is still practiced by uncivilized tribes of Africa and slave traders originating from a variety of places!. It was practiced when Iraq invaded Kuwait!. The practice was that those who would present a viable enemy in the near future were executed and all women were raped so that there would be a blood tie to their enemies which meant that negative actions would be an act against their own family!. The conquerors also believed that by getting the enemy's women pregnant that the next generation would carry their genes and character and therefore would not be a future threat!. It is still practiced by the rogue nations of today!. Rape, pillage and burn! Slave trading is still a modern day problem with their victims coming from all cultures and nations!. Blacks had it pretty rough and that preserved a lot of the natural characteristics, I presume, of the physical traits of their ancestors who had to duke it out with nature for survival!. Like it or not, we are all an assortment of human species, each with distinct characteristics inherited from the genetic make up of the parents for many generations back!. We are forever evolving as we adapt to our ever changing environments and the demands of survival!. The point is that each species of human being has distinct physical characteristics that set them apart from other species of human beings!. Talk to a forensic pathologist and you'll find that one of the distinctions between white and black is that blacks usually have very straight femurs, tibia and fibia while whites tend to be as bow-legged as the most weathered cowboy!. Why!? I haven't a clue! Women have a much thicker pelvic bone than men do!. This is a characteristic used to help identify the sex of a skeleton!. A black person's nasal passages in the skull tend to be larger than a white person's!. This is probably because of a need for more air intake as a matter of survival for the ancient ancestors who, in my opinion, had it a little rougher than their Northern counterparts!. Northerners only had a couple of predators to worry about for the flight or fight posture to kick in!. Africans were in a zoo full of predators constantly looking for a quick lunch!. If you're not sharp enough or quick enough then you go extinct!. Figure the evolution from there and as to whether or not it might help one species to be victorious over another!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

There was no natural selection about it they were bread (like we bread sheep or cattle) to be big and strong, If you notice the Black Africans (that is from africa) are good at long distance races, the African Americans and Blacks from other parts of the Americas are much better at the power sports, look at the 100 meters at the Olympics, all the best times are from the descendants of the slaves who were bought to the Americas as slaves, they were deliberately bred to be big and strong!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

No!. It was unnatural selection!. And despite some lurid "romance novel" series, there weren't organized attempts to breed slaves for strength!. Certainly they wouldn't have been bred for speed, which is the characteristic you see in many sports, such as football and basketball!. Add in the genetic material "contributed" by white slave owners, and you have nothing to support your thesis!.
Www@QuestionHome@Com

The monkey photo for yourself is hysterical!. I had to answer your question just to tell you that!. Maybe!. Are black sports stars then supposed to say "thank you" for enslaving their ancestors!? Is that a good trade-off especially when you consider what a miniscule percentage of people become sports stars!? Of course black people wouldn't even be in the U!.S!. if it weren't for slavery, they'd all still be in Africa!. But would the U!.S!. even exist as an independent country if it weren't for the original wealth built on slavery!? Maybe it was that wealth that helped us win the Revolutionary War!? We could go on and on with "what if's", but slavery still did some serious damage to the enslaved that will take many generations to overcome!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

The basic premise of your thought is flawed!. And here's why:
The continent of Africa has for centuries been plagued with tribal warfare that has lead to the enslaving and massacre of the losers!. The winner of the war takes who they want as slaves and then slaughters the rest!. Then along came the Europeans and the Asians who then saw a good deal and began purchasing those enslaved from the winner!. So, those who are now descendants of slaves are in fact the weaker not the stronger!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

'survival of the fittest' occurs with everyone not just descendants of black slaves!.!.!.if someone has the physical ability and the will to do it and the right attitude they can pursue their dreams in sports!.!.!.all athletes have to work their a**es off to get where they are!.!.!.!.so why would you just include black slave descendants!.!.!.!.have you heard of michael phelps the guy breaks world records like his life depends on itWww@QuestionHome@Com

Jimmy the Greek got fired for saying this, but there is a thread of truth in it!. If Blacks were naturally taller, faster, and stronger based on their African heritage then the NBA, NFL, etc would be rife with African players!. That isn't the case!. Their physical endowments are certainly a product of selective breeding by slavemasters!. Not PC, but true!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

No, not enough generations of forced selection for there to be much difference!. Besides modern Africans have pretty much the same musculature and abilities (if not oppurtunities)Www@QuestionHome@Com

no your wrongWww@QuestionHome@Com