| Question Home |
Position:Home>History> What was the commonwealth vs hunt case and why was it important?Question: What was the commonwealth vs hunt case and why was it important!? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Before this decision, based on Commonwealth v!. Pullis, labor unions which attempted to 'close' or create a unionized workplace could be charged with conspiracy!. However, in March 1842, Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw ruled that unions were legal organizations and had the right to organize a strike!. In 1839, the Boston Journeymen Bootmakers' Society called a strike against all employers who hired non-union members!. The leaders of the society, including one Mr!. Hunt, were arrested and charged with conspiracy!. The municipal courts for Boston found all the defendants guilty, but on appeal Shaw declared that the act of unionization and recognition of that union through strike was legal unless the methods to coerce workers to strike were illegal!. Since no threat of force was posed by the union, Shaw sided with the defendants and the Court went with him!. Though judges throughout the decade would become more anti-union, Commonwealth v!. Hunt served as a legitimizer for trade unions!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Before this decision, based on Commonwealth v!. Pullis, labor unions which attempted to 'close' or create a unionized workplace could be charged with conspiracy!. However, in March 1842, Chief Justice Lemuel Shaw ruled that unions were legal organizations and had the right to organize a strike!. In 1839, the Boston Journeymen Bootmakers' Society called a strike against all employers who hired non-union members!. The leaders of the society, including one Mr!. Hunt, were arrested and charged with conspiracy!. The municipal courts for Boston found all the defendants guilty, but on appeal Shaw declared that the act of unionization and recognition of that union through strike was legal unless the methods to coerce workers to strike were illegal!. Since no threat of force was posed by the union, Shaw sided with the defendants and the Court went with him!. Though judges throughout the decade would become more anti-union, Commonwealth v!. Hunt served as a legitimizer for trade unions!. <333333Www@QuestionHome@Com http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Commonwealt!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |