In the north they teach that it was because the south wanted to become its on country as well as slavery!. Do they teach it the same there!? And do people still think that it's not over!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>History> How do they teach the Civil War in the South?Question: How do they teach the Civil War in the South!? In the north they teach that it was because the south wanted to become its on country as well as slavery!. Do they teach it the same there!? And do people still think that it's not over!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Before answering the question there as to be some basic understandings!. During the last 50 years education has changed a great deal!. At one time public education was quite colloquial all over the country by being unique to the local region (including the South) but that is no longer true!. What is taught in public education the North or the West or the East, is also taught in Southern public education and that has resulted in a blanding of what is taught!. In addition, since world war two populations began to move around the country and that resulted with significant numbers of people moving to the south who had no southern family roots!. This imbued Southern culture with understandings and beliefs that viewed the Southern experience from a perspective not related to those of the South and reflective of ideas not believed by those from the South!. Certainly those of Southern family roots buried in the events of the 1860s period had beliefs that the South was had legally established their own country which was then invaded by the Armies raised by the Union federal government!. Many then, as well as many today believe that this war of the federal government on the Sovereignty of the States is yet continuing, but not in the manner that I suspect that you are asking it!. You have to first understand this was not about slavery except in the most indirect way!. You must also understand that those States which seceded did so believing that they were the direct and legitimate heirs of the Founders and their concepts of government and that the federal government had gone far astray from those concepts!. To this there is a great deal of truth!. The difference between the Union government and the Southern States is rooted in concepts existing prior to Constitutional ratification!. This difference can (in the short form) demonstrated in two areas, one is whether the States were Sovereign or not, the South believed yes and the federal government believe no!. This part of the debate can be expanded to President Lincolns stated belief that the States were created by the federal government (through the Constitution) and the South believed just the opposite!. The second part is whether the Bill of Rights is intended to focus exclusions only on the federal government (believed by the Southern States) or were intended to also include being exclusions on the States!. This can be expanded by looking at one major difference (of many) between the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the Confederate States of America!. That is a focus on slavery!. In the Constitution of the United States (although the word slave never appears) the opportunity to end slavery (within 21 years post ratification) was included but never was acted upon!. In the Constitution of the of the Confederate States of America the word slavery was mentioned but only in the sense that the importation of slaves was banned within the Confederacy!. More significantly, the Confederate Constitution left the definition of slavery and its existence (or lack thereof) to each State (as the States were considered sovereign)!. The point is (based on many additional items) that the South had a very different (relative to the Union federal government) at understanding State Sovereignty and the rights of the individual!. Time has proven the concerns (and fears) of the South of the direction of the federal government to to be based in reality!. Yes, the war continues (in a differing form) but now directed at all of the States!. The teaching of the reality of the American war of the 1860s is now dependent on oral histories of Southern families (no matter where they reside, and the studies of a growing number of academics!.Www@QuestionHome@Com It is fact that there was a war because Southern states wanted to secede from the union, I don't see how it can be taught any other way!. I don't know exactly how they teach it down south, I'm from Boston!. However, it was NOT a war over slavery!. Abe Lincoln said: “If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save the Union by freeing all the slaves I would do it!. And if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that!.” This means that the war was about reuniting, not about slavery!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Well, if u go to the deep deep south, there are some, and i stress SOME schools that teach the Civil War as the "War of Northern Aggression"!.Www@QuestionHome@Com sadly people DO still think it is not over my college professor taught us that the south was pretty much trying to split since the north wouldnt agree to its "rules" so yeah thats about rightWww@QuestionHome@Com It's taught the same way it is in the rest of the country!. Wow!.Www@QuestionHome@Com they only teach 3-5 but they dont say alotWww@QuestionHome@Com we learn it as it happened!. yes its the same!.Www@QuestionHome@Com omg i have always wanted to know that!!!! nice question :]]Www@QuestionHome@Com |