In what ways did Ronald Reagan expand the powers of his office!?
So far, all I've got is being anti-delente, which gave them more power over foreign affairs!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
Question Home |
Position:Home>History> How did Ronald Reagan expand the power of his office?Question: How did Ronald Reagan expand the power of his office!? In what ways did Ronald Reagan expand the powers of his office!?
So far, all I've got is being anti-delente, which gave them more power over foreign affairs!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: I think Reagan was given a lot more leeway- and therefor more power by the general public because Jimmy Carter preceded him!.Carter was widely viewed as an ineffective president who had naive notions about how Washington works!. Reagan had a lot of moxie implementing his policies whether they were domestic or foreign related!. Understand that with Carter's weak leadership America slipped into a recession so Reagan had the "savior appeal"going on as well!. So I think you can't overlook how Reagan was given license to do nearly whatever he wanted by popular opinion of the press and Congress!. So I think Reagan's leadership is somewhat exaggerated because Carter was in contrast so much weaker as a leader and anyone who took the reigns of the oval office after Carter would have been effective especially in relationship to Carter!. also, don't forget Nixon and Ford who were before Carter had their hands were tied largely because of the mistrust that was upon them because of the Watergate scandal!. So it was at least 7 years before Reagan that the White House had an effective president!. So that is why Reagan got such a huge welcome mat on the steps of the White House!. I think it is why his "legacy" is so ridiculously over exaggerated! Yes he was an agent of change but when you see for so long the void that was in the White House before him it stands to reason that his leadership would logically be effective and also exaggerated!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Several presidential scholars have underestimated Ronald Reagan’s power as president due to his seeming lack of oversight (e!.g!., Neustadt 1990)!. Instead, we argue that his focus on a few salient issues allowed him to exercise his power over his staff despite a lack of direct oversight!. Using Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency as the model of presidential power (Neustadt 1990; Dickinson 2000), we argue that Ronald Reagan, like FDR, was able to overcome information asymmetries, and therefore exercise power to similar degree!. In the vein of Miller (1992; 1993) and Bates, et al!. (1998) we utilize a formal model of presidential power to argue that Reagan, through his singularity of focus was able to solve the Principal-Agency problem, and therefore presidential aides and the bureaucracy acted for the benefit of the president, rather than for individual gain!. Because Reagan spent most of his political capital fighting (and ending) the Cold War and instituting “trickle-down” economics, he was able to capitalize on the political environment that faced him!. Using the theoretical analysis of contracts, we find equilibria in Principal-Agent games in which both the principal (the president) and agents (support staff) achieve increased utility through the use of simple contracts!. A simple contract, in the context of the president-staff relations, is an agreement between the president and his support staff in which the staff agrees to act in accordance to a broad presidential policy agenda!. The staff is then allowed to use their discretion on issues outside a president’s broad policy agenda!. We argue that Reagan found and utilized such simple-contract equilibria, thus increases utility for Reagan and his staff while allowing Reagan to maintain a hands-off managerial approach!. By focusing on a few salient issues in his contracts with staff, he was able to achieve his policy goals despite a limited role in staff relations!. Our work adds to the understanding of the presidency in three ways!. First, it builds from, and expands, earlier work regarding presidential leadership style and presidential power!. Second, we employ formal modeling, a tool rarely used in the study of the presidency or in the understanding of the presidents’ power!. Third, this paper expands upon previous Principal-Agency work, but applies the theory to the presidency!. Finally, we offer evidence that the conventional wisdom of Reagan as a weak leader in the White House deserves rethinking!. We feel that this work expands the understanding of Reagan’s presidency and the powers of the presidency more generally!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |