Question Home

Position:Home>Genealogy> Is it true that indians are the product of black and asian mixing?


Question: Is it true that indians are the product of black and asian mixing!?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
no , that is a lie

A non-resident Indian (NRI) is an Indian citizen who has migrated to another country, a person of Indian origin who is born outside India, or a person of Indian origin who resides outside India!. Other terms with the same meaning are overseas Indian and expatriate Indian!. In common usage, this often includes Indian born individuals (and also people of other nations with Indian blood) who have taken the citizenship of other countries!.
A Person of Indian Origin (PIO) is usually a person of Indian origin who is not a citizen of India!. For the purposes of issuing a PIO Card, the Indian government considers anyone of Indian origins up to four generations removed, to be a PIO!. [1]!. Spouses of people entitled to a PIO card in their own right can also carry PIO cards!. This latter category includes foreign spouses of Indian nationals, regardless of ethnic origin!. PIO Cards exempt holders from many restrictions applying to foreign nationals, such as visa and work permit requirements, along with certain other economic limitations!.
The NRI and PIO population across the world is estimated at over 30 million (not including Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan diasporas)!.
The Indian government recently introduced the "Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI)" scheme in order to allow a limited form of dual citizenship to Indians, NRIs and PIOs for the first time since independence in 1947!. It is expected that the PIO Card scheme will be phased out in coming years in favour of OCI!.
Contents [hide]
1 Moving on out
2 PIOs today
2!.1 Indians in the U!.S!.
2!.2 Indians in Canada
2!.3 Indians in the UK
2!.4 Indians in Australia
2!.5 Indians in New Zealand
2!.6 Indians in Singapore
2!.7 Indians in Malaysia
2!.8 Indians in Indonesia
2!.9 Indians in the Philippines
2!.10 Indians in the Middle East
2!.11 Indians in Mauritius
2!.12 Indians in South Africa
2!.13 Indians in East Africa
2!.14 Indians in Madagascar
2!.15 Indians in the Caribbean
3 Statistics
4 Bollystan
5 See also
6 References
7 Sources
8 External links
[edit]Moving on out

The most significant historical emigration from India was that of the Roma (often known as "Gypsies")!. Around the eleventh century, Central Asian invaders in the subcontinent took many Indians as captives to Afghanistan!. These people then went to Iran and other parts of the Middle East as wandering court musicians!. They gradually became a class of their own, wandering to Europe, where they were known as the Gypsies (based on the legend of their origins lying in Egypt)!. They adopted local religions such as Christianity and Islam, but combined some of their Hindu practices with the new faiths!. The cult of the Romani Christian saint Kali Sarah may have been a Christianization of the Hindu goddess Kali!. They also speak a distinct Indo-Aryan language of their own, Romani!.
Another major emigration from the subcontinent was to South East Asia!. It started as a military expedition by Hindu, and later Buddhist, kings of South India and resulted in the settlers' merging with the local society!. The Chola, for example, were known for their naval power and conquered Sumatra and Malay Peninsula!. The influence of Indian culture is still strongly felt in South East Asia, especially in places like Bali (in Indonesia)!. However, in such cases, it is not reasonable to apply the label 'PIO' to the descendants of emigrants from several centuries back, especially since intermixture is so great as to negate the value of such nomenclature in this context!.
The Indian merchant diaspora in Central Asia and Persia emerged in the mid-16th century and remained active for over four centuries!. Astrakhan at the mouth of the Volga was the first place in Tsardom of Russia where an Indian merchant colony was established as early as the 1610s!. Russian chroniclers reported the presence of Hindu traders in Moscow and St!. Petersburg in the 18th century!.[2]
During the 19th century and until the end of the Raj, much of the migration that happened was to other colonies under the indenture system!. The major destinations, in chronological order, were Mauritius, British Guyana, the West Indies (Trinidad and Jamaica), Fiji and East Africa!. There was also a small amount of free emigration of skilled labourers and professionals to some of these countries in the twentieth century!. The event that triggered this diaspora was the Slavery Abolition Act passed by the British Parliament on August 1, 1834, which freed the slave labour force throughout the British colonies!. This left many of the plantations devoid of adequate work force as the newly freed slaves left to take advantage of their newly found freedom!. This resulted in an extreme shortage of labour throughout many of the British colonies which was resolved by a massive importation of workers engaged under contracts of indentured servitude!.
An unrelated system involved recruitment of workers for the tea plantations of the neighbouring British colonies of Sri LankaWww@QuestionHome@Com

Are you speaking of the American Natives!?
Or E!. Indians!? Because there are many different tribes of Natives from America!? And all are not from one tribal blood line!. Some are mixed with the Norweigens, the Scotch, the British, and the Eskimos are Asian with the some that were from the what they called the White russian!?
There are the Tex Mex natives as well and so on!?
and Black is not in this hemisphere when the natives were originally here but the black is of the mongolian tribe which is known as the yellow race, or the Asian!? And that might be where that is confused but the American native is not of the black race they are however from the Asian, or mongolian and that is where the relationship would blend to the black but only through the asian but not the black and and a native!. look it up in geneology reports at best!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Only thing I recent heard is that the Indians and blacks cohabited because Americans used the black people as slaves and traded with the indians for the land they took!. I didn't know that till last week!.Www@QuestionHome@Com