How are Cycladic figures stylistically compared to sculptures created in ancient

Question: How are Cycladic figures stylistically compared to sculptures created in ancient egypt!?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:

The style of cycladic figures is clearly described in a short text at http://arthistory!.suite101!.com/article!.c!.!.!.
Basically, these figures are not realistic but are simplified unpainted small figures (mostly of women)!. Made of white marble, they are geometric in style!. They have been described, in fact, as abstract works of art pared down to minimal representational forms: flat, pure, and white!. But as you will read in the text, like the Egyptian sculpture, they were originally painted and decorated!.
Unlike Egyptian sculpture, their poses were not at all varied: typically they have arms folded above their stomachs!. Or else play a musical instrument (click on Playing a Harp)!. Typically the figures are frontal in stance and geometric in style with the arms folded above the belly!. They are designed to be viewed frontally only and not from the sides!. Because most of them have feet pointed downward, they may be designed to lay flat rather than stand vertically!. They are thought to be idols of some form!.
Sculptures in ancient egypt (I'm not talking about relief sculpture) were carved in the round (3rd dimension), originally painted, with the figures extremely realistically depicted !. They were monumental in size (except for the tiny "worker" figures they put into their coffins)!. Most depictions are of Gods or of royal personages and important people in their court!. They were carved from many different types of stone,not just white marble!. Www@QuestionHome@Com