Looking to see which lens is best,is it worth spending the extra for the 16-35,,Www@QuestionHome@Com
Question Home |
Position:Home>Visual Arts> Which lens? Canon EF 17-40mm L or Canon EF 16-35mm L,,?Question: Which lens!? Canon EF 17-40mm L or Canon EF 16-35mm L,,!? Looking to see which lens is best,is it worth spending the extra for the 16-35,,Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: You haven't specified which version of the 16-35 you are considering!. I believe the 17-40 outperforms the original 16-35 in terms of sharpness, but the new Mark II version 16-35 is the best of the three!. You really need to think about how important that extra stop of light is to you, because it's an expensive feature!. If you mostly want to use it on a tripod shooting landscapes, then there is no reason at all to want a faster lens!. If you think you would use that extra bit of speed and you have the money, then go for it!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Your buying L lenses if this is your widest then get the 16-35mm, if you already have a 10-22mm then the 17-35mm is good!.Www@QuestionHome@Com the 16-35 has a wider aperture which will let you photograph in lower lighting!. it's better to get a wide aperture lens!. it has more options when shooting!.Www@QuestionHome@Com I had opportunity to use both lenses, they are both awesome lenses, I'd go for the 16-35!.!.!. I love the width of the 16-35, it's fantastic!.Www@QuestionHome@Com My co-workers says EF 16-35mm are the best, they seems very happy with them!. I hope when you do decide which one you will get, you will be ok with them GOOD LUCKWww@QuestionHome@Com 16-35 is excellent lens get a cleaner photograph!.Www@QuestionHome@Com 16-35 mm is a better optionWww@QuestionHome@Com |