Question Home

Position:Home>Visual Arts> Does anybody knows this painter JOHN S. SARGENT is he a famous painter?


Question: Does anybody knows this painter JOHN S!. SARGENT is he a famous painter!?
because my aunt have a painting signed by this artist and i don't know nothing about paintings or painters I just want to know some background information because i don't know nothing PLEASE I NEED SOME INFORMATIONWww@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
john Singer Sargent (January 12, 1856 – April 14, 1925) was the most successful portrait painter of his era,[1][2] as well as a gifted landscape painter and watercolorist!. Sargent was born in Florence, Italy to American parents!.

Sargent studied in Italy and Germany, and then in Paris under Emile Auguste Carolus-Duran!.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Training
* 2 Works
o 2!.1 Portraits
o 2!.2 Other work
o 2!.3 Relationships
* 3 Assessment
* 4 Posthumous sales
* 5 Selected works
* 6 Notes
* 7 References
* 8 External links

[edit] Training

Sargent studied with Carolus-Duran, whose influence would be pivotal, from 1874-1878!. Carolus-Duran's atelier was progressive, dispensing with the traditional academic approach which required careful drawing and underpainting, in favor of the alla prima method of working directly on the canvas with a loaded brush, derived from Diego Velázquez!. It was an approach which relied on the proper placement of tones of paint!.[3]

In 1879, Sargent painted a portrait of Carolus-Duran; the virtuoso effort met with public approval, and announced the direction his mature work would take!. Its showing at the Paris Salon was both a tribute to his teacher and an advertisement for portrait commissions!.[4] Of Sargent's early work, Henry James wrote that the artist offered 'the slightly "uncanny" spectacle of a talent which on the very threshold of its career has nothing more to learn'!.[5]

[edit] Works

[edit] Portraits

In the early 1880s Sargent regularly exhibited portraits at the Salon, and these were mostly full-length portrayals of women: Madame Edouard Pailleron in 1880, Madame Ramón Subercaseaux in 1881, and Lady with the Rose, 1882!. He continued to receive positive critical notice!.[6]
Frederick Law Olmsted, 1895, oil on canvas, 91 x 61 1/4 in!.
Frederick Law Olmsted, 1895, oil on canvas, 91 x 61 1/4 in!.

Sargent's best portraits reveal the individuality and personality of the sitters; his most ardent admirers think he is matched in this only by Velázquez, who was one of Sargent's great influences!. The Spanish master's spell is apparent in Sargent's The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, 1882, a haunting interior which echoes Velázquez' Las Meninas!.[7] Sargent's Portrait of Madame X, done in 1884, is now considered one of his best works, and was the artist's personal favorite; eventually Sargent sold it to the Metropolitan Museum of Art!. However, at the time it was unveiled in Paris at the 1884 Salon, it aroused such a negative reaction that it prompted Sargent to move to London!.[8] Prior to the Mme!. X!. scandal of 1884, he had painted exotic beauties such as Rosina Ferrara of Capri, and the Spanish expatriate model, Carmela Bertagna, but the earlier pictures had not been intended for broad public reception!.

Before his arrival in England, Sargent began sending paintings for exhibition at the Royal Academy!. These included the portraits of Dr!. Pozzi at Home, 1881, a flamboyant essay in red, and the more traditional Mrs!. Henry White, 1883!. The ensuing portrait commissions encouraged Sargent to finalize his move to London in 1886!.[9] His first major success at the Royal Academy came in 1887, with the enthusiastic response to Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose, a large piece, painted on site, of two young girls lighting lanterns in an English garden!. The painting was immediately purchased by the Tate Gallery!. In 1894 Sargent was elected an associate of the Royal Academy, and was made a full member three years later!. In the 1890s he averaged fourteen portrait commissions per year, none more beautiful than the genteel Lady Agnew of Lochnaw, 1892!. As a portrait painter in the grand manner, Sargent's success was unmatched; his subjects were at once ennobled and often possessed of nervous energy (Mrs!. Hugh Hammersley, 1892)!. With little fear of contradiction, Sargent was referred to as 'the Van Dyck of our times'!.[10]

Sargent painted a series of three portraits of Robert Louis Stevenson!. The second, Portrait of Robert Louis Stevenson and his Wife (1885), was one of his best known!.[11] He also completed portraits of two U!.S!. presidents: Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson!.

[edit] Other work

During the greater part of Sargent's career, he created roughly 900 oil paintings and more than 2,000 watercolours, as well as countless sketches and charcoal drawings!. From 1907[12] on Sargent forsook portrait painting and focused on landscapes in his later years; [13] he also sculpted later in life!. His oeuvre documents worldwide travel, from Venice to the Tyrol, Corfu, Montana and Florida, and each destination offered pictorial treasure!. As a concession to the insatiable demand of wealthy patrons for portraits, however, he continued to dash off rapid charcoal portrait sketches for them, which he called "Mugs"!. Forty-six of these, spanning the years 1890-1916, were exhibited at the Royal Society of Portrait Painters in 1916!.[14]

Sargent is usually not thought of as an Impressionist painter, but he sometimes used impressionistic techniques to great effect, and his Claude Monet Painting at the Edge of a Wood is rendered in his own version of the impressionist style!.

Although Sargent was an American expatriate, he returned to the United States many times, often to answer the demand for commissioned portraits!. Many of his most important works are in museums in the U!.S!.; in 1909 he exhibited eighty-six watercolours in New York City, eighty-three of which were bought by the Brooklyn Museum!.[15] His mural decorations grace the Boston Public Library!.[16] For this commission, a series of oils on the theme of The Triumph of Religion that were attached to the walls of the library by means of marouflage, Sargent made numerous visits to the United States in the last decade of his life, including a stay of two full years from 1915-1917!.[17]

It is in some of his late works where one senses Sargent painting most purely for himself!. His watercolors, often of landscapes documenting his travels (Santa Maria della Salute, 1904, Brooklyn Museum of Art), were executed with a joyful fluidness!. In watercolours and oils he portrayed his friends and family dressed in Orientalist costume, relaxing in brightly lit landscapes that allowed for a more vivid palette and experimental handling than did his commissions (The Chess Game, 1906)!.[18]

[edit] Relationships

Among the artists with whom Sargent associated were Dennis Miller Bunker, Carroll Beckwith, Edwin Austin Abbey (who also worked on the Boston Public Library murals), Francis David Millet, Wilfrid de Glehn, Jane Emmet de Glehn and Claude Monet, whom Sargent painted!. Sargent developed a life-long friendship with fellow painter Paul César Helleu, whom he met in Paris in 1878 when Sargent was 22 and Helleu was 18!. Sargent painted both Helleu and his wife Alice on several occasions, most memorably in the impressionistic Paul Helleu Sketching with his Wife, 1889!. His supporters included Henry James, Isabella Stewart Gardner (who commissioned and purchased works from Sargent, and sought his advice on other acquisitions),[19] and Edward VII, whose recommendation for knighthood the artist declined!.[20]
Theodore Roosevelt, 1903
Theodore Roosevelt, 1903

Sargent was extremely private regarding his personal life, although the painter Jacques-émile Blanche, who was one of his early sitters, said after his death that Sargent's sex life "was notorious in Paris, and in Venice, positively scandalous!. He was a frenzied bugger!."[21] The truth of this may never be established!. Some scholars have suggested that Sargent was homosexual!. He had personal associations with Prince Edmond de Polignac and Count Robert de Montesquiou!. His male nudes reveal complex and well-considered artistic sensibilities about the male physique and male sensuality; this can be particularly observed in his portrait of Thomas E!. McKeller, but also in Tommies Bathing, nude sketches for Hell and Judgement, and his portraits of young men, like Bartholomy Maganosco and Head of Olimpio Fusco!. However, there were many friendships with women, as well, and a similar sensualism informs his female portrait and figure studies (notably Egyptian Girl, 1891)!. The likelihood of an affair with Louise Burkhardt, the model for Lady with the Rose, is accepted by Sargent scholars!.[22]

[edit] Assessment

In a time when the art world focused, in turn, on Impressionism, Fauvism, and Cubism, Sargent practiced his own form of Realism, which brilliantly referenced Velázquez, Van Dyck, and Gainsborough!. His seemingly effortless facility for paraphrasing the masters in a contemporary fashion led to a stream of commissioned portraits of remarkable virtuosity (Arsène Vigeant, 1885, Musées de Metz ; Mr!. and Mrs!. Isaac Newton Phelps-Stokes, 1897, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York) and earned Sargent the moniker, "the Van Dyck of our times!."[23] Still, during his life his work engendered critical responses from some of his colleagues: Camille Pissarro wrote "he is not an enthusiast but rather an adroit performer",[24] and Walter Sickert published a satirical turn under the heading "Sargentolatry"!.[25] By the time of his death he was dismissed as an anachronism,[26] a relic of the Gilded Age and out of step with the artistic sentiments of post-World War I Europe!. Foremost of Sargent's detractors was the influential English art critic Roger Fry, of the Bloomsbury Group, who at the 1926 Sargent retrospective in London dismissed Sargent's work as lacking aesthetic quality!.[27]

Despite a long period of critical disfavor, Sargent's popularity has increased steadily since the 1960s, and Sargent has been the subject of recent large-scale exhibitions in major museums, including a retrospective exhibition at the WWww@QuestionHome@Com