Is it democracy at its finest, or just bad manners for some to jeer at an outgoi

Question: Is it democracy at its finest, or just bad manners for some to jeer at an outgoing president of the USA!?

http://www!.wjno!.com/cc-common/news/secti!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:

It's an abuse of democracy!. People can express opinions without being rude or disrespectful!. The purpose of democracy is to allow all voices to be heard!. How people choose to say what they have to say is their individual choice and some people are just rude!. Some people are just rude anyway, like when ordering a burger too, so -Www@QuestionHome@Com

It's both!. In a dictatorship, cheering when the gov't tells you to jeer or jeering when the gov't tells you to cheer can get you an involuntary bullet-implant!. The ability to publicly denounce a leader without fear of reprisal is a hallmark of a democratic society!.

That said, a mass-jeering of an outgoing president (even if it was deserved) is also a hallmark of a bitter, boorish crowd whose parents probably didn't do a very good job teaching them manners or civility!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Could be!.
People will always jeer,the more people there are there,the more likely that that is to happen(it rarely happens at small gatherings)!.

And!.!.!."!.!.democracy at its finest!.!.!.", is probably unlikely,if not because the idea of "democracy"is very varied!.

(for what its worth,i have said that i believe that a new and better democracy is availabe;better that is,from the mass majority rule which is now in force!.
That better system would be one where the leaders are selected randomly!.For!.!.this would then be (better) governing BY the "people", FOR the"poeple"!.And as a first reasonable law for such an importantly-selected president and government,i further suggest that to make this fine country more "manageable/lawful"(and thus evolutionary-better)and even less-of-a-spiteful place,with too loud,spiteful people;this law should be one which limits family size;a very reasonable law which,as well as starting to curtail the jeers of the mob,should have other great and surprising benefits;such as virtually stopping illegal immigration-for who would willingly come here if their "family rights"were limed to 3 children!?
Anyway,it should help and NOT hinder poverty(as some possible jeerists might say!); it should also HELP unemployment;that is,i think this family size Law would be of immence benefit to all the country;and i urge others to try to accept this too)!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

People always get what they deserve!. Justice is usually served on a cold day!.

Democracy was broken when he was elected to lead and guide the people!. Now he left his office as a wreck; his command abandoned on foreign soils and people were left on the street without roofs!. It simply stinks!.

There is no sympathy for a job done badly and he didn't just do it badly, he left it at the worse possible state for the next guy in line!. Don't expect sincere thank anytime soon - or ever!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

I think when your cheering section passes 2 million, there ability to behave becomes marginalized!. The fact that they didn't stone him speaks volumes about democracy though!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

It is Liberty!. The freedom to express your revoltion at a leader who has caused such wide-spread suffering is an example of a cornerstone of our nations principles!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

In the present case, it is simply appropriateWww@QuestionHome@Com