| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Instead of candy, wouldn't it be easier to take, say, cabbage from a baby?Question: Instead of candy, wouldn't it be easier to take, say, cabbage from a baby!? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: It would, now that you mention it!. (You so crazy!.!.!.)Www@QuestionHome@Com how old of a baby!? at a very young age, they probably wouldn't see a difference, but as they grew older, and didn't like cabbage, they'd give up, while they'd cry if u took their candy!. so that expression is kind of dumb anyway!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Hahaha I love this question! Yes, it would be easier because the baby probably doesn't like cabbage as much as the sugar-laden sucker in his other hand!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Depends upon whether they digested it or not first!. I will pay good "lettuce" not to change a Cabbage filled diaper!Www@QuestionHome@Com yes it would because babies prefer candy then cabbage so the answer is YES!!!! this is a smart question!.!.!.i wondered it myself too!!! hehe!! hope i've helped!! good luck!!Www@QuestionHome@Com No, because babies love to play with balls and cabbage is an editable ball!. He He!Www@QuestionHome@Com yeah probably unless they love cabbage!?Www@QuestionHome@Com no, because the baby wouldnt have the cabbage in the first place!Www@QuestionHome@Com When I was a kid you could take my brocolli and liver away with no protest from me!.Www@QuestionHome@Com or broccoli!.!.!. unless the parents are veganWww@QuestionHome@Com why cabbage!?!?!?!?!?Www@QuestionHome@Com no babies love to play with cabbage head dollsWww@QuestionHome@Com Oh, god!. Here I am trying to take a head of lettuce away!.!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com lol yeah I suppose so!. Funny to think of!.!.!.!.!.!. Awesome question though!Www@QuestionHome@Com giggle laff chortle guffaw choke woops breathe smile txWww@QuestionHome@Com |