Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> Do you think men around the world would be quick to sign peace treaties if?


Question: Do you think men around the world would be quick to sign peace treaties if!?
woman banned war by with-holding sex!? Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
Don't worry - I thought it was funny!. The rest of the people who went on rants are either:
1) Withholding sex like you suggested and are frustrated; or
2) Sex is being withheld from them and they are frustrated!.

I guess it is proof it wouldn't work though!. No sex leads to frustration and a lack of humor!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Petty coat blackmailing may not change anything about wars!. You are presupposing wars are caused by men alone and that is an understatement!. Human nature has to be seen in the context of the purpose of wars!. It does not take place to mutilate, harm and kill, at least in theory and serves the war waging nation or sect a purpose and is not confined to gender!. The rationality of some wars may be justified too and there may be women who may be in support (not by witholding sex!)

Even assuming that you put all the women in a closet and get them to agree to such a scheme the ladies may have to start off socially to make group decisions which again is politics!. With non-consensus their war starts!.!.!.!.then what would your question be!? “that women around the world would be quick to sign peace treaties if men banned war by with-holding sex!?”

War is an extension of unresolved politics!. Theologically one asks if war is a means to an end outside the perimeters of war or whether it is an end in itself!. In other words the real enemy of war is the concept of war itself!. This is how Carl von Clausewitz may theorise it!.

A global effort to question the morality and ethics of wars is an issue for both gender!.Adress issues of need and greed!. One has to ponder the cataclysmic and eschatological schools of thought!. The rationality behind war is a human issue!. Women have been endowed with a clitoris for a different purpose!

(In the best of your intentions I would have thought this is a fun question; was it!? Either way dont be so hard on yourself, go get a drink and go on a date! No-one likes wars anyway!.!.!.!.)

Www@QuestionHome@Com

Your Absolutely right!. Although secretaries of defence are women and Margret thatcher,and queens in medieval days killing people,cutting off heads,and the British queen ordering Diane's assassination!. There no way there would be war if women withhold sex, some can go a long time,and my grandma knows a women that's over 70 and never done it!. But i dudes would just get pros or bimbo's,oh your assuming they still wont!. Look i read some of the messages about war, they just, assuming that people cant make a decision without forming a committee!. This world is revolved around limited options which only those of wealth to obtain, it and its money which divides people!. War is about a few people that just had the right words and gained the right money!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Not in this world darlin!. Too many politically correct people to turn an eye to sex with the same gender!. Besides if it got bad enough masturbation would be a daily event and somebody would probably make a lot of money from some form of sales to make it feel better!. Then some other guy would steal the idea in some other country and then the original inventor would have his member of Parliament or senator do something about it and the other country would refuse to co-operate then we would have to duke it out!. Which would lead to a fight!. which other countries would take sides on!.
Before you know it we would have a major war over the international copy right for the sales of "masturbation gel" because the women won't give it to us!!!
Darlin !.!.!. I think you would be best to keep the boys satisfied!. We really are a sad lot, with or without you!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Cute!. But hardly plausible!. You're operating under the erroneous assumption that the proliferation of war is gender based!. I would argue that it is not!. Wasn't it Margaret Thatcher who armed all of Britain's submarines with nukes!? Cleopatra pushed Antony into open Civil War with Augustus, there are all female assassin squads in South America and the orient, the Amazons were rumored to be a horror society where male infants had their arms broken or were killed at birth, etc, etc!.

War is about power!. As long as there are PEOPLE in power, seeking power, or looking to protect their power there will be war!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Do you realize that in some countries women have no rights at all!? They must be married because they can't work and if the husband decides he wants a divorce he has one!. He gets the kids! It is even possible for a man to kill his wife and get away with it!. It is also possible for a man to rape a woman and SHE will be executed for adultery!. He will not be punished!. You really think those women are going to do anything!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

ummm!.!.!.!.no because war would continue and men would just have affairs to satisfy their sexual needs!. This is an odd question coming from you, lol!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

man bad, woman good!.

Such sexism in the world!.

Women are far more violent than men!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Without a doubt!.
Peace or no piece!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

So if Eva denied Adolph sex!.!.!.!.!.!.!.

nah I don't think that would have worked!.!.!.!.
Www@QuestionHome@Com