Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> Is technology natural? What isnt? Where's the 'cut off'?


Question: Is technology natural!? What isnt!? Where's the 'cut off'!?
A birds nest, tools, weapons, chemicals, electricity etc!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
I suspect that human beings wear clothes mainly for medicinal reasons, that we wrap ourselves in extra layers of cotton and woolly to protect ourselves from the weather just the way we use medicine to stay well against infections, that our love of ease and comfort led us to lose the thickets of our bodily hair that were there to protect us from extremes of weather, and thus causing us to become vulnerable!. This is just the way some people wear glasses, as they would not be able to see well without them; or some people wear their wedding rings, as unlike birds, they would not be able to keep themselves mindful enough of their partners!. These, and many more, I think are the artificialities exceeding our natural needs, that I have right to suspect!.

I see no birds needing any clothes, and yet, they survive!. They survive all to well through the harshest of all seasons!. Animals do not need to light fires, they do not heed gas ovens, microwaves, hearths and toasters to cook their food before eating, and fish do not need paddles to out swim their rivals!. I think by losing our subservience and obedience to mother nature we have lost many things, but we have not lost the touch, and this is the one side of the problem, that we are still partially dependant upon nature!.

I think it is somewhere in the process of our natural evolution that we learn to opt out of the rigid control of general nature and ventured into the world of free enterprise of human spirit!. The search for better grasses in place of thick fruitless forest forests, for better hunt in the plains and savannas, and richer pastures led us to reach out, to go beyond the dictates of our basic nature, to run faster, and use numerous tools!. As a result we became independent but liable for our own wellbeing!.

This is all too common in human nature that when we search we search for the best, and when we do must that, we learn to become critical of not only what we can have but also of what we already have, and this includes ourselves, our cave, our pad, our ride, our intelligence, our tools and our ability!. This is why we constantly seek to improve ourselves, and improve the environment around us accordingly!. And often times, we see the best way to improve ourselves is in y improving things around us … a notion to led us to clash with the purposes of the mother nature!. We have replaced natural wilderness to create artificial wildernesses of concrete, aggressive, hostile and dehumanising structure of technology all around us, so much so that now we find no way to escape and no method to revert back to simplicity of our original nature!.

This has been a good question, as we really do not see as where exactly we should draw the line!. The onward march of scientific advancement where is the best promising thing in our life, at the same time, is overbearing and overburdening our natural need for simplicity!. This is the chief dilemma of the day that we as an intelligent species are facing!. For instance, how to cope with the power that knowledge has endowed upon us, and our intelligence that seeks to outwit our very sense of being human beings!.

The fact therefore is this: once the jinni is out of the bottle, there is no way to put it back, and the jinni would rest either unless it is give some fitting tasks to perform, such is the nature of our affairs that we have, as its seems, outsmarted ourselves!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

The answer to this question is highly dependent on how one sees people!. If people (usually, those who subscribe to this point-of-view restrict it to "modern people") are outside the natural environment, then, none of our technology, beyond the most Stone Age of tools, is natural!. But, if people are part of the natural environment, then the things we do, including the development of technology, would be natural as well!.

Personally, I think that humans are as much a part of the natural world as birds or rocks or trees are, and that the behaviors of these (humans, birds, trees) are just as natural as the things themselves!. It is human nature to try to control one's environment by developing technology; it's a survival mechanism we developed aeons ago!. It's analogous to how starfish can regenerate limbs when necessary, or how blowfish puff up when confronted!. So, the human development of technology is just as natural as any other behavior in the animal kingdom!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

It depends on how you look at it!.!.!. every piece of technology on earth came from earth!. So to some extent, yes, it's natural!. But you won't find a computer growing next to a Spruce tree if you go hiking!. It's pretty astonishing what the human race has done, I mean take this for example!.!.!. I live in Maine, you most likely live some place pretty far from where I am, yet we are conversing almost instantaneously (and we could if we wanted)!. A world without an Industrial Revolution would be pretty neat, but at the same time, stuff like computers, phones, radios, are neat!. The trick is don't become dependent on things that need electricity!. If your radio breaks (or Ipod) don't weep because you can't listen to your music, learn an instrument so you can make your own!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Technology is defined at the point where an environmental aspect or item is altered to be of use to the being doing the altering!. All of the things you mention are examples of technology!. If a chimpanzee strips the leaves from a stick and fishes for termites, that is technology!. If he simply takes a stick and uses it for the same purpose with leaves intact that is not, because he did not alter the item from the way he found it!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

"There is nothing new under the sun"!. I think if God can quote that then there really is no logic in asking the deeper question "why"!.

As many have already identified here there seems to be an agreement that technology in anything man makes or alters outside of its raw state or "natural" state!. No matter what the fabrication or use it first must go through the conscience where intent lays!. If I were to pick up a natural branch or stick and then have the intent to use it as a weapon for instance, does technology begin where the intent begins!? Then you have natural shapes like an natural object being round for instance!. If we use a round rock to roll heavier objects does that make the rock a item of technology!? Things natural can be used in their natural state and still be natural without having the title of being a device of technology!. What it comes down to is the creative mind creating useful tools with intent!. One could take a natural animal and train it to be a killer so you see it going beyond what we are talking about!. But I think I have made my point!. This is a great question though!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

Man-made implies not natural, because we see ourselves as separate from or above nature!. We are not, so all human works are natural!. The distinction is an aesthetic one, (I prefer a more natural living environment, etc!.!.!.!.)

Clones and AI are natures way of saying "Man, you are done!"Www@QuestionHome@Com

It ends when we end!. Yes it is natural, in a different way!. But don't worry mother nature is stronger and more powerful!. Lets take care of what takes care of us!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

everything we use are made by Natural resources from earth from the tools in ur shed to a birds nest so technology in a way is natural!.
Www@QuestionHome@Com

G Adaptation is technology!. So there is no limit because life is adaptation!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

All technological improvements are natural part of human /and animal/ evolution!.Www@QuestionHome@Com