How would you exactly define human values!? Are they different from moral values!? How are they different!?
Www@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> What are human values?Question: What are human values!? How would you exactly define human values!? Are they different from moral values!? How are they different!?
Www@QuestionHome@Com Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Human_value!.!.!. http://dictionary!.reference!.com/browse/m!.!.!. http://en!.wikipedia!.org/wiki/Moral http://www!.papyrusclubs!.com/node/513#Www@QuestionHome@Com Human values are most definitely different to moral values!. Moral values regard matters of right and wrong, and are constant and unchanging!. Right and wrong are not changeable by the moods of society: for example, just because gays are much persecuted, doesn't make homosexuality wrong!. Human (read: corrupt) values are shifty things, often confused with morals and moral values!. They change from person to person, from day to day and hour to hour, into whatever currently suits people!. It currently suits the Bush administration to relax its laws against torture, and they defend the move by saying it is not immoral!. This is not the case!. It is simply in agreement with their own current human values!. Human values, while occasionally (and with slowly increasing frequency) in accordance with moral values, are usually things that benefit the group of people, or person, perpetrating them!. Surprisingly enough, I much prefer moral values!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Human values can be classified in different ways!. It is we who add value to the 'matter'!. For instance if we pick up a paper and see that it contains our parents photo or our beloved God's photo, we like to add respect and value to it and try to preserve it!. If it contains the photo of some other unimportant person, we simply throw that!. In both cases, the paper is a mere paper!. We add value to it!. At the same time we also add value to 'life'!. There are positive values and negative values!. Positive values are those that lead us towards freedom, peace, fulfillment and happiness!. They are warm, shining and uplifting hence it is directed upwards!. Negative values are those that lead us towards bondage, conflict, sorrow, dark and debasing!. Hence negative values are directed downwards!. I mean they are considered low!. I will define moral value for self development and self discipline, etc!. and human value is how we give treatment to others in society like, brothers, neighbors, colleagues, elders, teachers, priests, artists, etc!. etc!. in showing kindness, compassion, sympathy, etc!. In you want further information, you may please purchase and read the book titled 'VALUES' published by Sri Ramakrishna Mutt, Mylapore, Madras-4!.Www@QuestionHome@Com To become a "believer" one struggles!. In discovering values, one also has to struggle!. Fortunately, I had a good teacher: A long time ago, I attended a lecture!. The keynote speaker was an authority on value theory!. I had hoped to learn something from him, but I didn’t!. After the talk, as was my custom, I went up to where the speaker took post lecture questions from the audience!. My Professor, who himself had some original ideas on value theory, was in the crowd!. When he noticed me, he immediately came over and started apologizing to me!. He was apologizing for something he felt uncomfortable about, something that he said to me the last time we were together!. At that time, I was taking his class, and, as was his style, he had just posed a question to the class!. I was not satisfied with the discussion of the question that followed, so I went up to him after class and asked, “What is the arête of man!?” I was simply repeating back to him the question he had asked the class to respond to!. He wouldn’t (or couldn’t) answer my question!. (Arête is a Greek word relating to purpose: the arête of a bow is to shoot straight!.) I didn’t know it at the time, but that semester was over for me!. Do to circumstances beyond my control, I quite university and moved to Arizona!. Because of my absence, he had jumped to the conclusion that his teaching method—his silence, had caused me to drop out of his class!. But now, in his apology, Dr!. Gill wanted me to know that that was not true!. He wanted me to know that his silence was not a surrender to “man’s lack of arête!.” His silence was simply a way to make a point!. “The only person who can answer that question, your question,” he said, “is you!.” A person’s arête was always peculiar to one’s unique situation at the time of posing the question!. He was apologizing to me because he did not answer my question; that is, until that very moment, and at that moment, he completely won me over!. I knew myself to be standing in the presence of a man of impeccable character, generosity and value!. Www@QuestionHome@Com The hierarchy of human values often addresses survival first and foremost!. This is at the foundational of priorities in general!. However with modern western civilization these needs are not often pressing as far as general global population is concerned!. That is not to say that many humans are not faced with how to meet basic survival needs on a daily bases, only that this would not be considered the norm for most cultures!. There is a saying that is relevant to your inquiry as to the comparison to human values and its relationship with morality the sayings goes "ask a starving man about morals" the point is that without our survival needs being met moral concerns are not a priority!. So that in a natural state humans are no more morally inclined than other primates!. But there is strong evidence indicating that morality stems from social instincts and learned social behavior!. Where basic needs are met humans can elevate moral attitudes, and consequently human values tend to become more abstract due to the increased social stability that results!. As moral values elevate the leisure available to pursue abstract values increases!. By abstract values I mean the arts, and sciences!. The benefit is that such cultures will usually benefit from these abstract values in that ever more efficient methods are found for securing the basic hierarchy of values and moral attitudes elevate, abstract values become more of a priority and so on and so forth!. The point I am trying to make here is that it depends upon how closely you want to look at the social dynamic!. If we examine things in a historical and broad context we get an overview suggesting that human values and morality are linked!. As more basic needs are met for larger portions of the populous the more time is spent on abstract values like morality, arts, and sciences!. Really it depends on what perspective you are in when you seek to define these terms!. Values is very flexible word but the at the root of the issue what is really being asked is what can you live without and what does it take to continue living!. The human animal is arguably the most complex creature and many of its values are abstract!. But there is little doubt that if returned to a natural state then we demonstrate values that are consistent with all other living creatures, that being basic survival!. In short I would say that at the primary system of human values rests upon survival and that the level of morality within a given human culture is directly proportional to how efficiently that culture is able to sustain its societies basic survival by meeting the basic hierarchy of needs for primates!. The thing is that primates, like most mammals, are highly socially developed and a great deal of social behavior is learned behavior so that culture is nothing more than enduring learned behavior!. Where humans and other higher cognitive primates (human ancestors) deviate from the norm is that our ability to conceptualize allows us to build upon learned behavior over time where as with other primates a new prevailing trend will effectively eliminate previous learned behavior within a few generations!. This is generally agreed to be the direct result of language development that is abnormal when compared to other primates that have a very limited range of abstract “words” or sounds with meaning!. Any the general theory is that as language in our ancestors improved we were able to preserve more culture through oral history for longer which allowed human tribes to learn from each other!. Something you do not often encounter in other primates!. Usually you are born into a certain culture and you learn those behaviors and that is the extent of it!. Really your question is worthy of a thesis and no doubt more than one anthropologist has likely tackled the challenge of attempting to quantify an categorize the differences of values and morality in humanity!. But there exists a great deal of variables to deal with and so one is only able to generalize!. These things are not set in stone but by and large this type of comparison of values and morality can serve as a point of reference for evaluating a particular culture, past or present, and then comparing it to a different culture!. It has prove so effective that similarities can even be drawn between modern humans and other modern primates, and indeed some of the most interesting findings are comparisons of these type!. For instances there was a man that has spent over 20 years studying baboon culture in a particular troop and using that data to gain insight into human culture!. I guess I should wrap this up now!. Sorry my post was so long but you asked a question that one can easily go into depth about!.Www@QuestionHome@Com human values are related from us to others and moral values is related from others to us!. Human values are something thats is present in us and spread with others and moral values are obtain from other to uWww@QuestionHome@Com I would define human values as: "Values that are important to humans!."Www@QuestionHome@Com Stupid cause people pay for gold that is only good as an conductor!.Www@QuestionHome@Com about $2!.99 a pound!. *rimshot*Www@QuestionHome@Com things that matter to usWww@QuestionHome@Com |