Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> What is worse: a world full of leaders or a world full of followers?


Question: What is worse: a world full of leaders or a world full of followers!?
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
and a world full of followers wont always agree!. its like planet of the apes!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

A world full of leaders cannot be bad!. Leaders are independent creatures, knowing their strengths and their limitations!. A group of real leaders would cooperate easilly, and adapt depending on the circumstances- following orders from the most competent depending on the circumstances

A world of followers!.!.!.!? ugh! hell on earth! mindless drones chanting slogans, eyes full of flame but empty of thought!.!.!.

I lived in such a world for most of my life!. It was called "socialism" but in reality it was the slavery of the soul

Thank God (and Walesa, Reagan and JP2) I am free nowWww@QuestionHome@Com

Personally, I think that a world of leaders would be better because without anyone leading, there would be nowhere to follow to and the world would stay in one place; whereas, with a lot of leaders, there would always be something to follow, and many ideas would rub minds together!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


a world full of followers, cause nothing would get done!. A world full of leaders would not get anything done either, but it would be fun to see them fight!.Www@QuestionHome@Com