Question Home

Position:Home>Philosophy> A life that was CONSTANTLY HAPPY was NOT a good life ?


Question: A life that was CONSTANTLY HAPPY was NOT a good life !?
An economist at Carnegie Mellon University recently said, "I think it's possible to way overestimate the importance of happiness!. Part of the meaning of life is to have highs & lows!. Alife that was constantly happy was'nt a good life"!. Do you all agree with him !?!?!?

Pls give an answer as long as u can, i will provide BA!. No doubt about it!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
The validity of the statement hinges entirely on one’s definition of a “good life!.”

If a “good life” means Holy or glorifying to God, then the person’s state of mind might not matter!. A good life could be lived in complete happiness or complete misery!.

If a “good life” means experiencing the full range of human capacities then a life cannot be complete without both joy and sorrow!. But by this definition, one could claim that a “good life” cannot be achieved without also committing acts of unspeakable evil!.

Economists are obsessed with up and down cycles which inspire the best of the human ingenuity and exercise inefficiencies out of the economy!. To an economist, it is inconceivable that a person or society would remain in the upper end of a cycle forever, and if they did then the inefficiencies would build up to intolerable levels!. Upward growth without a pause would lead to runaway inflation and unrestrained consumption!. There is no such thing as a free lunch and a life that ended in uninterrupted prosperity would leave a terrible price for others to pay!.

Other economic concepts that can be brought to bear are the law of diminishing returns and marginal utility!. In diminishing returns, the initial application of happiness will bring goodness to a person’s life but continuous happiness might actually be detrimental, resulting in a lack of incentive to pursue additional goals!. With marginal utility, the person appreciates some happiness, but appreciates each additional day of happiness less and less!. A down-cycle into unhappiness would lessen the damage done by “too much happiness” (diminishing returns) and would increase the marginal utility of happiness by creating a new perspective in its absence!.

Socialism is a good example of politicians offering workers happiness through entitlements!. A person might live happily with health care, a home, income that is not dependent on economic productivity, and a free pass to a movie theatre once per week!. But eventually entitlements such as these will consume a society’s wealth when distributed on a mass scale!. Even though an individual lives their entire life in the happiness of social entitlement, the party must come to an end and those left alive when the system collapses in on itself will look back and accuse the deceased as having lived stupidly and without ambition or risk—not a good life at all!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Not necessarily!. You can have highs and lows yet still be happy!. Life is about experiencing "life"!. We don't know what will come at us, and for good reason!. If we knew what would come of us, it's like taking a peak ahead of our story before we complete it!. If we do that, then we would not be living the mystery and adventure in life any longer!. Back to happiness: Happiness is a state of being, not doing!. It does not matter what happens, you can take life with a grain of salt!. It's how you choose to be!. I think what he might be staying too is that if one overestimates the imporatance of happiness, that might imply the efforts to be happy!. Happiness is effortless!. Again, it's about being, not doing!. Www@QuestionHome@Com

I think happiness and in general ay definition of "GOOD" or "Bad" is a matter of opinion!. I can say my life was good but ou may say it was bad, they are both opinions based on the individual!. So basically I wold tell that university that any "fact" they have is asd on an opinion!.

I consider a very cold shower good feeling, of course you may disagree!.

happiness and good and evl are all opinions of the individual and one cannot possibly hope to apply science to something like this, n ammount of observation will reap anythng but frustration or false results!. :)Www@QuestionHome@Com

Lets get the obvious reply out of the way first!.!.!.!.!.!.there is no such thing as a constantly happy life!.
That said lets explore why that would be!. Lets say that you were happy that you got a job when you were broke and with your first paycheck you bought a lottery ticket and won millions!. Which time were you the happiest!? Ergo there is no such thing as a perfectly happy life!.
The next thing is to explore what makes you happy!? But most importantly why does that thing make you happy!?
If you had no lows in your life you would not even know you were happy until that part ended!. Then you would look back and think how happy you were at that time!. But that thing that made you happy is no longer in your life are u still happy!? You could be!. But most likely the regret that the thing is gone would mar the happiness you could enjoy in this part of your life!.
Www@QuestionHome@Com

hmm!.!.!. i read somewhere that we all believe that happiness is something that is owed to us, not something that has to be earned or nurtured and that is why we struggle when we are upset, as everything has an opposite, we can't be happy all of the time, or expect happyness when life is a bit ****!. Not sure of the reference unfortunately!. Have you read Omelas by ursula k leguinn!? Www@QuestionHome@Com

A life that was
Constantly Sad,
Constantly Struggling,
Constantly Painful,
Constantly Suffering act
Was NOT a good life either

My friend, life is about BALANCING THE EQUATION!.
A good life is a life where one walk on the thin life dividing the
Good and bad
Ugly and beautiful
True and false
Success and failure
Www@QuestionHome@Com

What he was saying is that people have to increase their happiness to feel happy!. Sort of like feeling acceleration only occurs when you accelerate, i!.e!., increase your speed!. If happiness stalls at some level then you become numb to it!.

Only if there are downs can there be more ups in happiness because you cannot continually get happier all the time!. Sort of like saying can we continually get the fire hotter!? Well, no!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

nah, all cash rich pple are always happy!. look at their faces can know oredi!. no need to talk so much, and if u compare to the poor one, u see their face, all dull dull one!.!.!. as if like a zombie farted face like me!. i no money all the times!. hahahha!.!.

Rich and poor cannot compare ok ok then take a good look at the government dog faces, all happy faces all day long!. lol!. why!? they have the biggest paycheck than the private's paycheck!. that's why lor!. lol!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Without unhappiness, there can be no happiness!. Even if one never knew unhappiness, one could not feel happiness because happiness requires an appreciation of the absence of unhappiness!. Such a person would have no understanding of either!.Www@QuestionHome@Com