Position:Home>Philosophy> Is 1337 the primal bables of a non-corporeal consciousness?
Question: Is 1337 the primal bables of a non-corporeal consciousness!?
The other day I answered a question asking to provide example of 1+1=0!. Among the answers, one person took note of how 1+1 in Leet Speak can be interpreted as "Hi!." Now, in addition to this, he noticed that the "=0" can function as an emoticon of a person with there mouth open, as if speaking!.
Are there hidden messages in texts!? That is, as the logic of western syntax is pushed to its extreme in communication technologies and crafts a new semantic environment, have the primal babels of non corporeal beings begun!? Have we succeeded in "outering" ourselves to the point where consciousness as begun to beget a being!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
I don't know what you're getting at, but symbology i don't think means a thing!. only what you use it to say matters!.
i don't see why having a symbol mean multiple things would make a difference, just like words can have two meanings!.
that's why tabooing swearing is so ridiculous!. is it the spelling that matters!? well no because when i swear you can't see the spelling, is it the sound that matters!? well no because words in other languages can have the same sound and are not bad!. is it the meaning!? well i guess not, because you can use a swear word to mean many things!. it's so stupid!.
you can compliment someone by swearing or be rude to them!. complimenting i am down with no matter what words you use, being rude i am not down with even if you never use a swear word!.
same thing with any other word or symbol!. the only thing that matters is the message you are delivering!. nothing else matters!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
I thought about it this way, can two non-corporeal beings tell each other a joke!? Can they be sarcastic with one another!? Can they describe to another about the way something feels!? I would like to subscribe that these are corporeal being capabilities and that they would stay that way no matter how "advanced" communication technologies become!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
skatta, you have summarized in a few short words what i have been trying to explain for years!. thank you!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
why the need for complicated!?
consciousness needs no thought!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com