Position:Home>Philosophy> Immanuel Kant study guide question! Points given immediately!?
Question: Immanuel Kant study guide question! Points given immediately!!?
The good will and duty and the motive of duty
1!. An act don from duty and an act done in accordance with duty are!.!.!.
a) the same thing!.
b) ethically equaly!.!.
c) irrecnt in ethcial thought!.
d) hard to distinguish
2) Acts done in accordance with duty!.!.!.
a) have no moral worth!.
b) are the same thing as those done from duty
c) are supererogatory
d) none of the above
3) Acts done from the motive of duty!.!.!.
a) have moral worth
b) have no moral worth
c) are supererogatory
d) Both A and C
4) Jesus' commandment that we love our enemies shows!.!.!.
a) good example of divine ethics
b) an act done from the motive of duty as we cannot have such an inclination
c) how to end wars!.
d) None of the aboveWww@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
1!.) c-because according to Kant, only a person with a good will will act selflessly in accordance with duty!. He does it withhout thinking because it is the right thing to do!.
A person who does a right act because of accordance with duty is doing so because he does not want to get caught!. IN the categorial imperative, he gives an example of this by using the shopkeeper!. Did you not do your reading!?
2!.) c!. I had the same question in my intro to philosophy class!.
3!.) a
4!. B
I hope that these help but you really need to look over the Categorial imperative!. If you glance over it, the answers are all there!.Www@QuestionHome@Com
An act done from duty and an act done in accordance with duty are not the same thing!. It's not enough for an action to merely "coincide" with duty !.!.!. the act must be exacted in the name of duty in order to be considered moral!.
"Supererogatory" just means going beyond your moral duty and doing something worthy of special praise morally!. It doesn't really make sense to talk about supererogatory acts in a Kantian framework because moral goodness is exactly equivalent to fufilling one's moral duty !.!.!. there's no such thing as being "more moral" than you are required to be by your duty!.
So:
1) (c)
2) (a)
3) (a)
4) !.!.!.!. not too sure !.!.!.!. I don't really like any of them!. d)!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
The only thing I know about Immanuel Kant is that he was a real pissant!.Www@QuestionHome@Com