| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> How much do we need to understand in order to see?Question: How much do we need to understand in order to see!? How far can a baby see!? Is everything beyond what a small child can understand just a jumble of colours!? Is it like road blindness, when you've been driving for along time and suddenly you lose the idea that it's actually a road, with distance, and all that!?Www@QuestionHome@Com
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Babies see, I heard somewhere that babies are born shourtsited!. With less awareness a small child will know their surroundings and will only know an iota of possible knowledge!. Road blindness is to do with repetition and possibly hyponotism, the distance is random the all that bit would probably refer to time which is also random!. Understnding comes with experience and those who have no experience therefore won't understand!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Understanding is residual effect of seeing alongside the use of other sense!. The mind retains such effects in a systematically ordered form in memory as part of our knowledge of our immediate surrounding!. I do not believe that we need to understand at all for the purpose of seeing, however, we do need to see to understand!. It would be impossible, for instance, to be able to read and comprehend each and every letter of a word and each and every word of a sentence for its full meaningfulness!. If we concentrate just a little harder than normal upon something in order to understand the meanings seeing will become blurred imaginatively, and if we speed up our observation then obviously we run the risk of losing sense of what we see!. Then if we let ourselves imagine that seeing is like walking upon the surface of things, then just beneath that surface is ocean like existence that it is all too easy for the mind to fall through!. The physically sensible world of reality into could give way to a sort of metaphysical state of deeper and extended meaningfulness that might or might not have anything to do with our conventional way of understanding!. If I try to think for instance too hardly about anything then the very impression that I built through the grasp of my senses, including my eyes, would give way and I would not be seeing but imagining!. When people gaze into crystal balls, for instance is that they lose their focus first of all and then their sense of perspective allowing their subconscious mind to find its exposure!?Www@QuestionHome@Com We don't need to understand anything to see!. I assume you are referring to words that label and help to organize the mental picture we have of the world!. In fact, I would think that the more we think we understand the less we see!. Goethe said that nothing stops observing more than coming to conclusions!. We rely on our mental preconception and memory rather than the immediate impression!. Sort of like when a web browser remembers a site we have been to and instead of downloading the latest version of it just loads the files from the cache!.Www@QuestionHome@Com We need to understand the steak is medium rare, the chips are cooked to perfection, and the egg yolks are nice and runny!. All else is irrelevant!.Www@QuestionHome@Com You got it the wrong way 'round!. We see first!. Then we understand!. What we call 'reality' is how we perceive the world around us, essentially just a jumble of colours and stuff and muffled noises!.Www@QuestionHome@Com I think it depends!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Thinking takes from reality!.!.!.It is but a mere distraction!.!. consciousness needs no thought!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Can I have 2 pints of what you have been drinking please!?Www@QuestionHome@Com |