| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Is It Worse To Suffer For A Cause...Or To Have A Total Absence Of Meaning In OneQuestion: Is It Worse To Suffer For A Cause!.!.!.Or To Have A Total Absence Of Meaning In One's Life!? Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: Here, in the philosophy section, we hold that the unexamined life is not worth living!. Therefore it is worse to lack meaning than it is to suffer from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune!.Www@QuestionHome@Com If one chooses to suffer for a cause, there is motivation within that person!. If there is a total absence of meaning in one's life, there is likely no motivation within that person!. To have motivation is to have purpose!. To have purpose is to have a goal!. To have a goal is to have a vision!. An ancient Jewish proverb eludes to the fact that a man without a vision will perish!. Is the absence of meaning a motivation to perish!? Is lack of motivation reason enough to be considered as "worse" in the question you've posed!?Www@QuestionHome@Com definately total absense of meaning in life!. when you're suffering for a cause, at least you're helping something! but you've got no meaning in life, things become!.!.!. boring!.Www@QuestionHome@Com It depends on what cause that is!.!.!. sometimes it'd be better for humanity if someone had a total absence of meaning instead of dying for something not rightWww@QuestionHome@Com why not just commit yourself to the cause and not suffer!? there are ways to further the cause without causing yourself pain!.Www@QuestionHome@Com We are to be happy human beings, loving, giving, singing, talking, being a friend to all menWww@QuestionHome@Com Depends!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Stand for something or fall for anything!.Www@QuestionHome@Com it is worst to lose the meaning of the cause because you are absent in your own meaning!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com |