The first person learns and continuously learns every battle strategy and tactics
The second person knows basic strategies and tactics, but has a much better reasoning and logical background than the formerWww@QuestionHome@Com
| Question Home |
Position:Home>Philosophy> Everything equal, which General will win the most battles?Question: Everything equal, which General will win the most battles!? The first person learns and continuously learns every battle strategy and tactics
The second person knows basic strategies and tactics, but has a much better reasoning and logical background than the formerWww@QuestionHome@Com Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: reasoning and logic, because he will be able to adapt to strategies the other employs with no end, though the one with a library of tactics is limited to his library, so there will be eventually some tactics he cannot defend against!. basically one can only learn tactics that already exist whereas the other will invent new ones, therefore always being one step ahead of the other!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Try reading Musashi Miyamoto's Circle of Five Rings, the definitive text on tactics and battles!. The second person has more flexibility, and is better able to chose and develop any of his basic strategies and tactics because of his reasoning and logical skills, while the first will be locked into a strategy, while learning another!. [The best battle is indeed no battle!. Battles are not infinite ventures, they are won or lost with a decided and final outcome!. Any action whatsoever carried to infinity will average out!.]Www@QuestionHome@Com The one willing to go into battle!. According to their nature, there are both people who have quick intelligence, and those who must withdraw and take time to think things over!. Looking into this thoroughly, if one thinks selflessly, surprising wisdom will occur regardless of the high or low points of one's nature!.' People think that they can clear up profound matters if they consider them deeply, but they exercise perverse thoughts and come to no good because they do their reflecting with only self-interest at the center!.Www@QuestionHome@Com That would not be a winning battle for either general!. I do not believer that all things are ever equal in war though!. If you read the Art of War, it goes into amazing detail on such matters!. I would possibly favor the learner as opposed to the thinker!. Adaptation is a necessity!.Www@QuestionHome@Com if they fought each other an infinite amount of times it would break down evenly!.!.!.as soon as a new concept is mastered by the thinker, it's likewise indentified by the learner!. as soon as it's identified by the learner, a new concept is mastered by the thinker!. as soon as a new concept is mastered by the thinker, it's likewise indentified!.!.!.you get the pictureWww@QuestionHome@Com A general would already know the knowledge of both the first and second person, otherwise they wouldn't be a general!. Unless promoted there by favoritism!. They no matter what they do it will be a mistake!.Www@QuestionHome@Com Man will attempt anything his mind can conceive and his heart will allow!. Therefore, he who has the bravest heart, shall will!. For it is he that will attempt the most daring and in succeeding, win!.Www@QuestionHome@Com The second!. But with better reasoning and logic, wouldn't he chose not to go to war but instead use diplomatic channels to achieve peace!?Www@QuestionHome@Com napoleon bonapartWww@QuestionHome@Com |