Epistemology: Would you consider infinitism to hold no absolute value?

Question: Epistemology: Would you consider infinitism to hold no absolute value!?

considering the premise is a multitude of absolutes!? Would you consider there to be a wide array of absolutes for a given effect!.!.!.!. or is the concept of absolutes not absolute!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:

I do not quite digest your question!.

Knowledge is widely accepted as meaning justified belief!. Traditional theories of justification are foundationalism and coherentism, and most philosophers consider an infinite regress not to be a valid justification!. In their view, if A is justified by B, B by C, and so forth, then either (a) the chain must end with a link that requires no independent justification (a foundation), or (b) the chain must come around in a circle in some finite number of steps (the belief may be justified by its coherence) or (c) our beliefs must not be justified after all (as skeptics believe)!.

Infinitism is the view that justifications have an essentially infinite, non-repeating structure!. I consider this as non-actionable, as an idea hold because alternatives are not understood!. The proof that foundationalism is true would be a set of irrefutable statements!. The proof that coherentism is true would be a set of chained irrefutable statements!. You cannot ask for any such set for infinitism!. At best, a proof for infinitism could be proof all other alternatives are false!. In logic, this is called to prove a negative, and suggests that a true answer is not in this direction!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

The premise is NOT a "multitude of absolutes!." There can be no such thing, or it would be an absolute that "a rock is flowing water is 'My Little Pony!.' "

http://www!.aynrandlexicon!.com/lexicon/in!.!.!.Www@QuestionHome@Com