Hegel philosophy?

Question: Hegel philosophy!?

does it have any application to politics do u thinkWww@QuestionHome@Com

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:

The Hegelian dialectic could be adjusted to be political as a compromising of two sides!.

The Hegelian dialectic argues that an assertion (known as the "thesis") gives rise to its opposite (know as the "antithesis")!. This tension between the two sides plays out in some combination, compromise, or shifting of understanding that its better (known as the 'synthesis')!. While Hegel seemed to use the dialectic as an epistemological tool, it could be simplified to relate to politics!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

Hegel posited that, for the human 5-sense awareness immersed in materiality, any attempts to define the "Real" end in contradiction, emptiness!. This is contrary to Parmenides, Plato's Ideas, Plotinus, and Husserl!.

Hence, this existential "Nothing" for Hegel brings forth the Heraclitan (and higher order, "Begriff" or "notion of") "Becoming" as Sartrean 5-sense data stream "maturity!."

Hegel, Sartre, and Heidegger ("Mitsein") are all on the same page, so far as political application!. Hegel finds "Geist" or "human spirit" to be the evolving of self-knowing, self-realizing, as the motif for such "Becoming!."

"World historical figures," or realized intelligentsia, channel such cultural unfoldings or sublations, i!.e!. proferring re-solutions of antinomies as reframed by greater awareness!.

There may be a Universal or Absolute Spirit in-Forming such processes--the "Kingdom come" of Christian eschatology!.

These concepts are rather broadly fungible: i!.e!., sometimes there is progress or sublation, the re-solution of previous conundrums via more awareness!. But this reflects a scientistic "eternal progress" bias, a kind of Maslowian faith in self-actualization based on progressivism!.

As a broad theory, progress does often give way to stasis, and more knowledge and awareness often brings "sublation!." While this seems profound and plausible, it is not all that specific, and is even self-evident, common-sensical!.

Thus, the presumption of a driving source of Progress is questionable; Spengler and Toynbee challenged this rosy 19th century scenario with historical facts, showing the rise and fall of civilizations, even into darker ages!. So Hegel's perspective is somewhat reasonable, but there is no real evidence for presuming it to be a philosophy grounded in fact!.Www@QuestionHome@Com