Isn't it preposterous really to suggest there could be "problems"

Question:computerization effort.
You'd imagine there'd be perhaps 21 subsystems. So each subsystem is testable with 20 test systems. Wouldn't that eliminate all errors ? Somebody must be too lazy to run the existing automated tests, if there's still a "problem". What's going on ?

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: computerization effort.
You'd imagine there'd be perhaps 21 subsystems. So each subsystem is testable with 20 test systems. Wouldn't that eliminate all errors ? Somebody must be too lazy to run the existing automated tests, if there's still a "problem". What's going on ?

Dude, I would love to answer your question, but out of my ignorance of the subject, I have no idea what your talking about. I wish I could be of more help really.

If I had to "BS" it though, I would say that the processes should eliminate all errors, and that people are getting lazier and lazier as technology becomes increasingly more advanced.

No.

Unsinkable. Somebody once said that.

There'll always be something you haven't thought of.