Position:Home>History> Who do you think caused the 9/11 attacks?

I'll refer to the so-called Pentagon Attack!.

When I was ~ 10 years old, I saw the debris field of an airline crash near Chicago's O'Hare Field, about 5 days after the crash!. The bodies and body parts had been removed, I guess, but the wreckage was still there!.

The entire field was covered in wreckage, luggage, seat parts, wiring, insulation, paper, clothing, and all of the detritus that goes in, and into building, a Boeing 727!.

The first thing I noticed was a 20-ft tail assembly all alone, still covered in paint!. It had been broken off intact!. Next was one of the engines, burnt, but still easily seen as a jet engine - the wheels were still inside!. Next came the tube of the fuselage, easily seen as a fuselage from a 727, with some of the seats still attached!. All of this came from a plane that is much, much smaller than the 757 that allegedly struck the Pentagon!.

Where was the wreckage at the Pentagon!? Nowhere!. Where were the 12-ft engines!? Nowhere!. Where was the 60-ft tail assembly!? Nowhere!. Where is the fuselage that held some 300 seats!? Nowhere!. Where are the seats, for that matter!? Nowhere!. Where were the bodies and body parts!? Nowhere!.

The government says that the entire plane, and all of it's contents burned up!. An open, kerosene-fed fire cannot get hot enough to vaporize an airplane! It's an impossibility!. No amount of "sheltering" could have turned that building portion into a fire that hot!. It can not be done!.

So no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon that day!. It sickens me that this government still insists on insulting the intelligence of it's citizens by fabricating this false, shallow story!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

---

---

Who ordered the attacks!?
Who let those men fly into towers!?
Who claimed responsibilty!?
Who is the mental person who took away those young lives like a sadistic loco!?!

It wasn't any Jew!.

It was Osama Bin Laden!. He caused 9/11, and he is a Muslim!.

If the Jews run America, I don't think Barrack Obama was a Jew, I don't think Hillary Clinton!. GWB certainly isn't a Jew, he declared one day 'Jesus Day'!.

Get some sense before ranting absolute nonsense!. Innocents died because of one madman!. Don't sully their memory!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

---

---

Popular Mechanics went through the whole conspiracy theroy in great detail!. The nuts that hijacked the planes & the men that planned it are at fault!.
The report issued by Lamont-Doherty includes various graphs showing the seismic readings produced by the planes crashing into the two towers as well as the later collapse of both buildings!. WhatReallyHappened!.com chooses to display only one graph (Graph 1), which shows the readings over a 30-minute time span!.

On that graph, the 8- and 10-second collapses appear — misleadingly — as a pair of sudden spikes!. Lamont-Doherty's 40-second plot of the same data (Graph 2) gives a much more detailed picture: The seismic waves — blue for the South Tower, red for the North Tower — start small and then escalate as the buildings rumble to the ground!. Translation: no bombs!.

WTC 7 Collapse
Claim: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed!. According to 911review!.org: "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one!."

Fire Storm: WTC 7 stands amid the rubble of the recently collapsed Twin Towers!. Damaged by falling debris, the building then endures a fire that rages for hours!. Experts say this combination, not a demolition-style implosion, led to the roofline "kink" that signals WTC 7's progressive collapse!. (Photograph by New York Office of Emergency Management)

FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse!. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated!. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM!. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out!." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner!.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research!. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down!. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other!. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse!.
According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq!. ft!. of floor area for each floor!. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down!."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another!. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities!.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours!. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says!. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators!. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line!. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time!."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse!.Www@QuestionHome@Com

---

---

Unfortunately the most detailed answer is the one in which the physics behind the collapse of the towers is detailed but since it doesn't agree with your silly conspiracy theory you won't choose it as best answer!. Why didn't you just say "the answer that is closest to my thinking wins best answer"!?Www@QuestionHome@Com

---

---

Usama Bin LadinWww@QuestionHome@Com

---

---