Question Home

Position:Home>History> Could you pls tell me "whom "refers to who ,and what is the meaning of


Question: Could you pls tell me "whom "refers to who ,and what is the meaning of "in him "and " arreted"!.thanks!
the said noble gentlemen instantly required me to imprint the history of the said noble king and conquereor King Arthur ,and of his knights,with the history of the Saint Greal,and of the death and ending of the said Arthur ;affirming that i ought rather to imprint his acts and noble feats, than of Godfrey of Boloine,or any of the other eight,considering that he was a man born within this realm,and king and emperor of the same:and that there be in French divers and many noble volumes of his acts,and also of his knights!.TO WHOM I ANSWERED that divers men hold opinion that there was no such Arthur,and that all such books as been made of him be feighed and fables, because that some chronicles make of him no mention, nor remember him nothing,nor of his knights!.
Whereto they answered,and one in special said,that IN HIM that should say or think that there was never such a king called Arthur might well be ARETTED great folly and blindness!.Www@QuestionHome@Com


Best Answer - Chosen by Asker:
“To whom” refers to “the said noble gentlemen”!.

Who else was in a position to be answered!?

The form “ARETTED'' is an obsolete word meaning “presumed” or “credited”!.

The sentence could be paraphrased in modern English as:

“The answered on that point, and one of them particularly said that great folly and blindness might be presumed in any who should say or think that there was no such king as Arthur!.”

The subject of the sentence is “great folly and blindness”!. The verb in full is “might well be aretted”!. The verb governs an adverb phrase: “in him that should say or think that there was never such a king called Arthur”!.Www@QuestionHome@Com