Could the Fugitive Slave Act apply to slaves who had escaped prior to 1850?

Question:need history help! cant find answer!

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker: need history help! cant find answer!

I would say yes, unfortunately. See below. It wouldn't have made any difference if a slave was free or a slave. He just had to be suspected of being a runaway - or accused. I have included the Wiki site. It''s pretty good.

In the response to the weakening of the original fugitive slave act, the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 made any Federal marshal or other official who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave liable to a fine of $1,000. Law-enforcement officials everywhere now had a duty to arrest anyone suspected of being a runaway slave on no more evidence than a claimant's sworn testimony of ownership. The suspected slave could not ask for a jury trial or testify on his or her own behalf. In addition, any person aiding a runaway slave by providing food or shelter was subject to six months' imprisonment and a $1,000 fine. Officers who captured a fugitive slave were entitled to a bonus for their work. Slave owners only needed to supply an affidavit to a Federal marshal to capture an escaped slave. Since any suspected slave was not eligible for a trial this led to many free blacks being conscripted into slavery as they had no rights in court and could not defend themselves against accusations.[citation needed]

I would have to say yes. It's my understanding the law applied to ALL slaves. A slave who escaped prior to the law would certainly have been returned to his or her owner.